BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

slope

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by gmatmachoman » Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:58 pm
neoreaves wrote:Lines n and p are on xy plane. Is slope of n less than that of p?
1. Intersect point (5, 1)
2.The Y intercept of line n is greater than that of p

Good question bro!!

IMO C
Join the discussion

by neoreaves » Fri Apr 16, 2010 2:17 am
I think it should be C too .....can you share your solution so i can compare it with my method ?
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Fri Apr 16, 2010 2:46 am
neoreaves wrote:I think it should be C too .....can you share your solution so i can compare it with my method ?
IMO C
here is my solution
since <p is greter than ,n slope of P is > than N
we need bth statements
Attachments
untitled.JPG
Join the discussion

by kstv » Fri Apr 16, 2010 3:41 am
need two points to find the slope of a line
m= y2-y1/x2-x1 so option (C)
if (x1, y1) is (5,1)
the lines pass through the y axis
for line n (0, Y) and p (0, y) where Y > y
slope of p = 1-Y/5 n = 1-y/5
the denominator is same so numerator will influence m

visually (the graph shown in the earlier post)
it is obvious that greater the y intercept , lesser is the x intercept
or steeper is the slope of the line after passing through (5,1)
slope of a line is also = y intercept / x intercept
but the point (5,1) is imp otherwise the x intercepts cannot be compaired.
Join the discussion

by eaakbari » Fri Apr 16, 2010 11:17 am
kstv wrote:need two points to find the slope of a line
m= y2-y1/x2-x1 so option (C)
if (x1, y1) is (5,1)
the lines pass through the y axis
for line n (0, Y) and p (0, y) where Y > y
slope of p = 1-Y/5 n = 1-y/5
the denominator is same so numerator will influence m

visually (the graph shown in the earlier post)
it is obvious that greater the y intercept , lesser is the x intercept
or steeper is the slope of the line after passing through (5,1)
slope of a line is also = y intercept / x intercept
but the point (5,1) is imp otherwise the x intercepts cannot be compaired.
I thought C too, but thats a nice solution.
Whether you think you can or can't, you're right.
- Henry Ford
Join the discussion