Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

EXCEPT Question !

Expert replies
by himu » Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:48 am
Political Analyst: Because our city is a border city, illegal immigration is an important issue in the current race for mayor. Of the two candidates for mayor, one supports a plan that would attempt to deport the city’s 9,000 illegal immigrants and the other does not. Surveys consistently show that about 60% of the city’s residents are opposed to the plan, while about 35% are in support of the plan. Therefore, the candidate who does not support the plan will win the election for mayor.

All of the following statements weaken the analyst’s argument, EXCEPT:

In the city at issue, most voters make their voting decisions based on the candidates’ positions on abortion.
Of the 35% of residents who support the plan, some are willing to consider alternate plans for addressing illegal immigration.
Many of the residents who oppose the plan are not registered voters.
The candidate who supports the plan is the incumbent mayor, and has been elected to four consecutive terms despite taking controversial positions on many important issues.
Just under 30% of the city’s residents are illegal immigrants who cannot vote.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by The Iceman » Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:26 am
IMO B
Join the discussion

by Kasia@EconomistGMAT » Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:03 am
Let's break down the argument.
Premise 1 - illegal immigration is an important issue
Premise 2 - first candidate wants to deport 9000 immigrants and the other one does not
Premise 3 - 60% of residents are opposed to this plan, 35% support it
Conclusion - the candidate who is against this plan is going to win

We need to find the statement that strengthens our conclusion.
A - irrelevant, if residents choose a candidate based on positions concerning other controversial issues, any of the candidates can win so this statement weakens the conclusion
B - correct, this statement strengthens the conclusion because maybe even more people will not support the plan
C - this statement weakens the conclusion as we don't know whether the number of registered voters who oppose the plan will exceed the number of the ones who support it
D - incorrect, the candidate who supports the plan has already been elected the mayor despite his controversial views so this might happen again this time
E - incorrect, the number of illegal immigrants might not be large enough to exceed the number of supporters of the plan
Last edited by Kasia@EconomistGMAT on Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:32 am, edited 2 times in total.
Kasia
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT - the #1 rated GMAT course

• If you found my post helpful, please click the "thank" button and/or follow me.

• Take a 7 day free trial and find out why Economist GMAT is the highest rated GMAT course - https://gmat.economist.com/

• Read GMAT Economist reviews - https://reviews.beatthegmat.com/economis ... mat-course
Join the discussion

by himu » Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:10 am
HI Kasia,

But this is : All of the following statements weaken the analyst’s argument, EXCEPT :(
Join the discussion

by Kasia@EconomistGMAT » Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:27 am
Exactly, so you need to find the answer choice that does NOT weaken the conclusion, in other words the one that STRENGTHENS it.
Kasia
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT - the #1 rated GMAT course

• If you found my post helpful, please click the "thank" button and/or follow me.

• Take a 7 day free trial and find out why Economist GMAT is the highest rated GMAT course - https://gmat.economist.com/

• Read GMAT Economist reviews - https://reviews.beatthegmat.com/economis ... mat-course
Join the discussion

by Practicegmat » Tue Dec 11, 2012 7:44 pm
What I believe is : Does not Weaken answer means it should not weaken the argument.

We cannot weaken an argument by :
1) mentioning something irrelevant
2) strengthening the argument

In that way this question has 2 correct choices :

A - IRRELEVANT
B - STENGTHEN

Please let me know where I am wrong
Join the discussion