BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

except inference

Expert replies
by thephoenix » Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:55 am
Jim: The United States Mint has recently announced that the rising cost of raw copper, nickel, and zinc has pushed the cost of manufacturing each penny and nickel to more than 1 cent and 5 cents respectively. In addition, there are very few, if any, items that can be purchased for 5 cents, and virtually none that can be purchased for a penny. Since it appears that both the penny and the nickel no longer provide a necessary function in today's economy, I propose that the government simply stop minting the coins at a loss and declare the base unit of U.S. currency to be the dime.

Mary: Don't be silly. This would mean that all prices would round up to the nearest dime and nobody would go for that. There is simply no way that Congress would approve, much less consider, such an unpopular measure.

In her response to Jim, Mary does all of the following EXCEPT:
a) Makes an assumption about how Jim's proposal would affect prices.
b) Implies that Congressional approval is necessary for Jim's proposal to take effect.
c) Provides a reason why Jim's proposal would be difficult to implement, regardless of its justification.
d) Assumes that Congress will never approve a policy that has little public support.
e) Attempts to undermine all or some of the premises upon which Jim justifies his proposal.

what is the best way to deal such questions
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by komal » Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:30 am
thephoenix wrote:Jim: The United States Mint has recently announced that the rising cost of raw copper, nickel, and zinc has pushed the cost of manufacturing each penny and nickel to more than 1 cent and 5 cents respectively. In addition, there are very few, if any, items that can be purchased for 5 cents, and virtually none that can be purchased for a penny. Since it appears that both the penny and the nickel no longer provide a necessary function in today's economy, I propose that the government simply stop minting the coins at a loss and declare the base unit of U.S. currency to be the dime.

Mary: Don't be silly. This would mean that all prices would round up to the nearest dime and nobody would go for that. There is simply no way that Congress would approve, much less consider, such an unpopular measure.

In her response to Jim, Mary does all of the following EXCEPT:


a) Makes an assumption about how Jim's proposal would affect prices.
b) Implies that Congressional approval is necessary for Jim's proposal to take effect.
c) Provides a reason why Jim's proposal would be difficult to implement, regardless of its justification.
d) Assumes that Congress will never approve a policy that has little public support.
e) Attempts to undermine all or some of the premises upon which Jim justifies his proposal.

what is the best way to deal such questions
In an Inference type question, out of 5 answer choices 1 correct answer choice will be 'inferred' and 4 answer choice will not be 'inferred' from the stimulus. However, if EXCEPT is added to the inference question it means that 4 answer choices will 'infer' and 1 answer choice will not 'infer'.

Hence in an EXCEPT INFERENCE question our job is to find that 1 answer choice which cannot be 'inferred' from the given passage.

My pick here is (C) because Mary infers all of the remaining four answer choices except (C).
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:35 am
In her response to Jim, Mary does all of the following EXCEPT:

a) Makes an assumption about how Jim’s proposal would affect prices.

Yes .She makes an assumption. How can we say that? Go back to the argument.Look for the key words.Mary says..."This would mean that all price...." " would mean....." hints that she is assuming something which may or may not be real.

b) Implies that Congressional approval is necessary for Jim’s proposal to take effect.

Yes.Again take the cue from her response. look for key words.

c) Provides a reason why Jim’s proposal would be difficult to implement, regardless of its justification.

Not sure.Lets hold on.We will come back to it in a while.

d) Assumes that Congress will never approve a policy that has little public support.

Oh yeah.She yells in her statement that .."nobody would go for that.."Nobody is a strong word for " little public support".


e) Attempts to undermine all or some of the premises upon which Jim justifies his proposal.

Yeah Obviously, She is trying to oppose him.

So C stands out. Mary doesn't seem to give any reason why Jim’s proposal would be difficult to implement.

That makes C to be the winner!!
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:36 am
OMG..people are getting very active these days...By the time i was editing my post I saw Ms. Komal bombarding the query with her post...Awesome..
Join the discussion

by komal » Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:37 am
gmatmachoman wrote:In her response to Jim, Mary does all of the following EXCEPT:

a) Makes an assumption about how Jim’s proposal would affect prices.

Yes .She makes an assumption. How can we say that? Go back to the argument.Look for the key words.Mary says..."This would mean that all price...." " would mean....." hints that she is assuming something which may or may not be real.

b) Implies that Congressional approval is necessary for Jim’s proposal to take effect.

Yes.Again take the cue from her response. look for key words.

c) Provides a reason why Jim’s proposal would be difficult to implement, regardless of its justification.

Not sure.Lets hold on.We will come back to it in a while.

d) Assumes that Congress will never approve a policy that has little public support.

Oh yeah.She yells in her statement that .."nobody would go for that.."Nobody is a strong word for " little public support".


e) Attempts to undermine all or some of the premises upon which Jim justifies his proposal.

Yeah Obviously, She is trying to oppose him.

So C stands out. Mary doesn't seem to give any reason why Jim’s proposal would be difficult to implement.

That makes C to be the winner!!
Wow that was some awesome explanation : )
Join the discussion

by vijay_venky » Tue Feb 02, 2010 2:21 am
I will go with E for this.

She is not attacking the premises of the argument of Jim. But she provides a new outlook in to it.

As far as C is concerned, yes though the justification is there, she tries to provide a reason for the probable denial of Jim's stance (public disapproval)
Join the discussion

by nileshdalvi » Tue Feb 02, 2010 2:55 am
This post can clear up the major confusion and also provide the OA.

https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/jim ... t3743.html
Join the discussion

by melguy » Wed Dec 14, 2011 5:39 pm
Official explanation:

Jim initially presents two premises: 1) it costs more to make a penny and a nickel than their face value; and 2) there is little that can be bought for a penny or a nickel. He goes on to opine that the coins no longer provide any necessary function in the economy, then concludes with a proposal to remove the coins from circulation and declare the basic unit of American currency to be 10 cents.

Mary responds by making several assumptions about the practical effects of the plan, implying that such a policy could never be implemented.

(A) All prices rounding up to the nearest dime would certainly be a negative consequence from a consumer viewpoint, and this contention is not presented anywhere in the passage as a statement of fact; it is simply an assumption made by Mary.

(B) By asserting that Congress would not approve such a proposal, Mary implies that such approval is necessary in order to implement Jim's plan.

(C) Mary provides an argument that such a proposal would have little practical chance of being implemented because of its unpopularity, which in fact is not necessarily correlated with whether the proposal would save money.

(D) Despite the proposal's obvious monetary benefit, Mary states that "Congress would never approve such an unpopular measure." Mary is assuming Congress will think the popularity of the measure is more important than the potential monetary benefit.

(E) CORRECT. Mary's response is based on her assertion that Congress would not approve Jim's proposal because she assumes that it would be extremely unpopular. She does not attack or even mention any of Jim's premises underlying his proposal.
Join the discussion