BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Evaluate----Magazine publisher.

Expert replies
by amysky_0205 » Sun Dec 30, 2012 11:53 pm
Magazine Publisher: Our magazine does not have a liberal bias. It is true that when a book review we had commissioned last year turned out to express distinctly conservative views, we did not publish it until we had also obtained a second review that took a strongly liberal position. Clearly, however, our actions demonstrate not a bias in favor of liberal views but rather a commitment to a balanced presentation of diverse opinions.

Determining which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the cogency of the magazine publisher's response?

A.Whether any other magazines in which the book was reviewed carried more than one review of the book?
B.Whether the magazine publishes unsolicited book reviews as well as those that it has commissioned?
C.Whether in the event that a first review commissioned by the magazine takes a clearly liberal position the magazine would make any efforts to obtain further reviews?
D.Whether the book that was the subject of the two reviews was itself written from a clearly conservative or a clearly liberal point of view?
E.Whether most of the readers of the magazine regularly read the book reviews that the magazine publishes?

OA: C

can someone explain this? and how to eliminate to the right answer

thank u!!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by nash.8087 » Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:44 pm
Magazine publisher concludes that the magazine is not biased to liberal views but they are rather inclined to diverse opinion. He concludes this because the 2 reviews ended up giving 2 different positions.

We need to search for an option that questions publisher's point: "magazine is not biased to liberal views".

IMO - A,B,and E are irrelevant.
among C and D, answer to option D would not give us any hint if the magazine is biased to liberal views. And answer to option C will help us determine if the magazine is biased towards liberal view because if the first review turns out to be liberal and then if the magazine doesn't go for second review, then it is clear that magazine is biased towards the liberal views.
Join the discussion