BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Ethanol

Expert replies
by vscid » Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:42 am
Ethanol is a derivative of corn and other grains. When burned as fuel, it emits significantly lower levels of carbon monoxide, a major atmospheric pollutant, than does gasoline. For that reason, environmentalists claim that ethanol is a better source of energy than gasoline.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the environmentalists' claim?

1]When burned as fuel, ethanol does not release any pollutants at higher levels than does gasoline.
2]Ethanol is comparable in price to gasoline.
3]Available supplies of corn are sufficient to supply several years' worth of ethanol.
4]Most gasoline companies already possess the technology to produce ethanol.
5]Ethanol can be used as heating fuel.
The GMAT is indeed adaptable. Whenever I answer RC, it proficiently 'adapts' itself to mark my 'right' answer 'wrong'.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by komal » Sat Feb 20, 2010 12:35 pm
vscid wrote:Ethanol is a derivative of corn and other grains. When burned as fuel, it emits significantly lower levels of carbon monoxide, a major atmospheric pollutant, than does gasoline. For that reason, environmentalists claim that ethanol is a better source of energy than gasoline.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the environmentalists' claim?

1]When burned as fuel, ethanol does not release any pollutants at higher levels than does gasoline.
Correct : Argument is based on the premise that ethanol emits lower levels of a major pollutant than gasoline. This answer choice supports the conclusion by adding that ethanol does not release ANY pollutants at higher levels than does gasoline.

2]Ethanol is comparable in price to gasoline.
Incorrect : Does not help strengthen the conclusion.

3]Available supplies of corn are sufficient to supply several years' worth of ethanol.
Incorrect : Availability of corn for ethanol is not an issue here.

4]Most gasoline companies already possess the technology to produce ethanol.
Incorrect : Ethanol production technology is clearly out of scope.

5]Ethanol can be used as heating fuel.
Incorrect : Irrelevant.
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:34 pm
vscid wrote:Ethanol is a derivative of corn and other grains. When burned as fuel, it emits significantly lower levels of carbon monoxide, a major atmospheric pollutant, than does gasoline. For that reason, environmentalists claim that ethanol is a better source of energy than gasoline.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the environmentalists' claim?

1]When burned as fuel, ethanol does not release any pollutants at higher levels than does gasoline.
2]Ethanol is comparable in price to gasoline.
3]Available supplies of corn are sufficient to supply several years' worth of ethanol.
4]Most gasoline companies already possess the technology to produce ethanol.
5]Ethanol can be used as heating fuel.
conclusion:
ethanol is a better source of energy than gasoline.

premise:Ethanol,When burned as fuel emits significantly lower levels of carbon monoxide, a major atmospheric pollutant, than does gasoline

supposting statment will support either con or prem or bth

a)correct supposts premise
b)price is out of scope
c)supply of corn is out of scope
d)no effect
e)no effect
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:00 pm
Don't you think that A is already specified in passage. Why B is wrong? what if gasoline price is $2/gallon and ethanol price is $10/gallon. In that case how come the ethanol could become better source of energy?
komal wrote:
vscid wrote:Ethanol is a derivative of corn and other grains. When burned as fuel, it emits significantly lower levels of carbon monoxide, a major atmospheric pollutant, than does gasoline. For that reason, environmentalists claim that ethanol is a better source of energy than gasoline.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the environmentalists' claim?

1]When burned as fuel, ethanol does not release any pollutants at higher levels than does gasoline.
Correct : Argument is based on the premise that ethanol emits lower levels of a major pollutant than gasoline. This answer choice supports the conclusion by adding that ethanol does not release ANY pollutants at higher levels than does gasoline.

2]Ethanol is comparable in price to gasoline.
Incorrect : Does not help strengthen the conclusion.

3]Available supplies of corn are sufficient to supply several years' worth of ethanol.
Incorrect : Availability of corn for ethanol is not an issue here.

4]Most gasoline companies already possess the technology to produce ethanol.
Incorrect : Ethanol production technology is clearly out of scope.

5]Ethanol can be used as heating fuel.
Incorrect : Irrelevant.
Join the discussion

by dbaner1 » Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:17 pm
I choose A

B is not in the scope of this question. Nowhere does it mention anything about prices
Join the discussion

by harshavardhanc » Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:23 pm
reply2spg wrote:Don't you think that A is already specified in passage. Why B is wrong? what if gasoline price is $2/gallon and ethanol price is $10/gallon. In that case how come the ethanol could become better source of energy? [/color]
nopes. The stimulus only tells us about Carbon monoxide. Not about any other pollutant. And that is the exact reason why option A becomes a supporter to the claim.

Imagine, if Ethanol emitted every major pollutant, other than Carbon Monoxide, in larger quantities than gasoline does.

would environmentalists, who only gauge a fuel based on the pollutants it emits, make this claim about Ethanol?

Got the point? :)

Price doesn't matter to these people. As long as the fuel emits less of pollutants, the fuel is "good".
Regards,
Harsha
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:23 pm
dbaner1 wrote:I choose A

B is not in the scope of this question. Nowhere does it mention anything about prices
well said..thats the way to start!!
Join the discussion

by carrillo1228 » Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:20 am
what threw me off was the fact that the question says,

...it emits significantly lower levels of carbon monoxide, ..."

where as answer choice A refers to 'any'

1]When burned as fuel, ethanol does not release any pollutants at higher levels than does gasoline.

can someone help me understand this? (Probably an occupational hazard since we are always told, 'never use definitive words like, never, all, everything, blah blah blah)....

is the word 'any' negated by the fact that the sentence later states 'at higher levels' which implies that it does release pollutants at lower levels?
Join the discussion