Main verb

BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

This topic has expert replies

Post new topic Locked

Previous Topic Next Topic

Deepthi Subbu: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 298; Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 1:09 am; Thanked: 2 times; Followed by:1 members

Main verb

by Deepthi Subbu » Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:52 pm

Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886,outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

Can 'were written' be considered the main verb of the main clause?

I understand that verb - ing (without the is/are/was/were/be) and verb - ed cannot act as a verb . But how about 'were + written' ( I suppose written here acts as the past participle) . Can words of this form (were/was + past participle) become the main verb of the sentence?

Quote

Source: Beat The GMAT — Sentence Correction | Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:52 pm

EducationAisle: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 434; Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:42 pm; Location: Bangalore, India; Thanked: 91 times; Followed by:46 members

by EducationAisle » Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:10 pm

Deepthi Subbu wrote:Can words of this form (were/was + past participle) become the main verb of the sentence?

Sure, why not. More specifically, were is the main verb and written, as you said, is a past participle (a verbal, in Grammar parlance).

Ashish
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:

a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana

b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi

Quote

Deepthi Subbu: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 298; Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 1:09 am; Thanked: 2 times; Followed by:1 members

by Deepthi Subbu » Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:25 pm

Thanks , but as per OG12, the sentence has an error -

Explanation - 'The long, wordy opening clause gives too much emphasis to the period when Dickinson's letters were written; it is unclear what outnumbering refers to.'

Cant the sentence mean

' Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few
years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, THEREBY
outnumbering her letters to anyone else. '

Here's the correct sentence -

'Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber her letters to anyone else.'

A main clause can have only one verb. Here 'which' refers to the letters and if 'were written' becomes the main verb for the main clause , how can another verb 'outnumber' exist .

I guess am highly confused somewhere , but unable to realize as to where exactly the confusion is.

Quote

EducationAisle: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 434; Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:42 pm; Location: Bangalore, India; Thanked: 91 times; Followed by:46 members

by EducationAisle » Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:41 pm

Hi Deepthi,

Actually there are two clauses in the correct sentence (split just by the nature of the sentence):

1. Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson outnumber her letters to anyone else.

2. which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susans marriage to Emilys brother and ending shortly before Emilys death in 1886

Now, perhaps it would be easy for you to figure out that outnumber is the main verb in the first clause and were is the main verb in the second clause.

An easier example to understand how Independent clause can be split would be:

Sachin, who scored a century, is a great cricketer.

The two clauses here are:

1. Sachin is a great cricketer - is is the main verb

2. Who (Sachin) scored a century - scored is the main verb

Quote

Deepthi Subbu: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 298; Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 1:09 am; Thanked: 2 times; Followed by:1 members

by Deepthi Subbu » Fri Dec 31, 2010 1:50 am

EducationAisle wrote:Hi Deepthi,

Actually there are two clauses in the correct sentence (split just by the nature of the sentence):

1. Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson outnumber her letters to anyone else.

2. which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susans marriage to Emilys brother and ending shortly before Emilys death in 1886

Now, perhaps it would be easy for you to figure out that outnumber is the main verb in the first clause and were is the main verb in the second clause.

An easier example to understand how Independent clause can be split would be:

Sachin, who scored a century, is a great cricketer.

The two clauses here are:

1. Sachin is a great cricketer - is is the main verb

2. Who (Sachin) scored a century - scored is the main verb