Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Embezzlement

Expert replies
by bhumika.k.shah » Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:35 am
A recent study concluded that the employees most likely to embezzle are those who have not been trained in a company ethics course or do not have a stake in the financial success of the company. Company C, which had problems with employee corruption in the past, has had several recent cases in which its employees have been suspected of embezzlement.

According to the study, which of the following employees is LEAST likely to embezzle from company C?

A.An employee who was not trained in a company ethics course and owns shares of another company’s stock.

B.An employee who has taken an ethics course offered outside the company.

C.An employee who has a side business as a stock analyst, but does not own any of company C’s stock.

D.An employee who does not own any of company C’s stock but was trained in company C’s ethics course.

E.An employee who owns stock in many different companies, but not in company C.


I spent 3 minutes on this problem and yet i got it wrong!
:(
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by bhumika.k.shah » Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:50 am
I finally got it !

I drew a table and made sub columns with either of the 2 conditions being satisfied and another column based on the previous two that would an employee in each option be considered for this !

Any time saving approach ???
bhumika.k.shah wrote:A recent study concluded that the employees most likely to embezzle are those who have not been trained in a company ethics course or do not have a stake in the financial success of the company. Company C, which had problems with employee corruption in the past, has had several recent cases in which its employees have been suspected of embezzlement.

According to the study, which of the following employees is LEAST likely to embezzle from company C?

A.An employee who was not trained in a company ethics course and owns shares of another company’s stock.

B.An employee who has taken an ethics course offered outside the company.

C.An employee who has a side business as a stock analyst, but does not own any of company C’s stock.

D.An employee who does not own any of company C’s stock but was trained in company C’s ethics course.

E.An employee who owns stock in many different companies, but not in company C.


I spent 3 minutes on this problem and yet i got it wrong!
:(
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:51 am
IMO D

most likely to embezzle=who have not been trained in a company ethics course or do not have a stake in the financial success of the company

LEAST likely to embezzle from company C=eiher who have been trained in a company C's ethics course or have a stake in the financial success of the company

a)person who=have not been trained in a company C ethics course or do not have a stake in the financial success of the company C=most likely to embezzle

b)=same as A
c)does not own company c's stock=most likely to embezzle
d)
was trained in company C’s ethics course=LEAST likely to embezzle from company C
e)=do not have a stake in the financial success of the company C=most likely to embezzle

OA pls
Join the discussion

by DeepakR » Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:55 am
Premise - Those who have not been trained in a company ethics course or do not have a stake in the financial success of the company.

D. seems better option. Is the OA D.) ?

A - not trained and owns shares outside C..hence most likely to engage in embezzlement
C - no financial stake in C and owns a different bussiness..hence most likely
B - no ethics course of C and no stake in C..hence more chances
E - owns stake in other companies so more chance of embezzlement.

- Deepak
Join the discussion

by bhumika.k.shah » Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:55 am
OA D
Join the discussion

by vijay_venky » Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:12 am
I have a doubt in the logic that has been explained,

if<> then<> construct when it contains an either or premise it turns out to be an "and" in contra-positive , so

P1. if Not trained or do not have stake --> embezzle

the contra positive should be

not embezzle --> trained and have stake.

This is because the above P1 could be divided as

1. Not trained --> could embezzle
2. do not have stake --> could embezzle.

Please clarify.
Join the discussion

by komal » Wed Feb 03, 2010 8:28 am
bhumika.k.shah wrote:A recent study concluded that the employees most likely to embezzle are those who have not been trained in a company ethics course or do not have a stake in the financial success of the company. Company C, which had problems with employee corruption in the past, has had several recent cases in which its employees have been suspected of embezzlement.

According to the study, which of the following employees is LEAST likely to embezzle from company C?

Cause : No training in company ethics course /No stake in company
Effect : Embezzlement

LEAST likely means FOUR ANSWER CHOICES will support the causal relationship stated above and ONE ANSWER CHOICE will not support it. Lets see which one :


A.An employee who was not trained in a company ethics course and owns shares of another company’s stock.
Incorrect : No training in ethics - So this one is LIKELY to embezzle

B.An employee who has taken an ethics course offered outside the company.
Incorrect : Ethics course offered outside the company may not match with ethics of the company. Hence even this one is LIKELY to embezzle.

C.An employee who has a side business as a stock analyst, but does not own any of company C’s stock.
Incorrect : No stake in company - LIKELY to embezzle

D.An employee who does not own any of company C’s stock but was trained in company C’s ethics course.
Correct : Trained in Company's ethics - NOT LIKELY to embezzle

E.An employee who owns stock in many different companies, but not in company C.
Incorrect : No stake in company c - LIKELY to embezzle

Hope This Helps : )
Join the discussion