BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Elite Official Revision SC Q # 25

Expert replies
by richachampion » Tue Sep 05, 2017 2:34 am
The first trenches cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia, in what is now southern Iraq.

A. cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but

B. cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arose simultaneously but

C. cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously but

D. cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence of centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arising simultaneously but

E. cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arose simultaneously with but
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by richachampion » Tue Sep 05, 2017 2:35 am
Please discuss the tenses → were arising Vs arose

why is tense of continuity not preferred here over the simple past?

Can we also discuss evidence for / evidence of / evidence that in terms of their idiomatic existence?

According to the Ron Purewal:

"evidence for" → This is used for some argument or position, not for some thing that once existed.
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
Join the discussion

by richachampion » Tue Sep 05, 2017 2:35 am
OA : E
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
Join the discussion

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Tue Sep 05, 2017 7:52 am
richachampion wrote:The first trenches cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia, in what is now southern Iraq.

A. cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but

B. cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arose simultaneously but

C. cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously but

D. cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence of centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arising simultaneously but

E. cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arose simultaneously with but
For the sentence to parallel/logical, we need simultaneously with but independently of. ("Simultaneously" and "independently" are adverbs, while "with" and "of" are prepositions, giving us the construction: adverb + preposition but adverb + preposition)

Eliminate B, C, and D.

The easiest way to eliminate A is to ask what "that" refers to. The verb with "that" is "were," indicating that we want a plural antecedent. The closest plural antecedent is "Northern regions," and this wouldn't make much sense.

As for continuous past vs simple past, continuous past would be used for an activity that happened continuously over some duration in the past, while simple past connotes that the activity happened at some point in the past. "A" seems to make it sound as though these societies "were arising simultaneously" for some duration, but then they stopped arising at the same time. Whereas in "E" it sounds as though the two events simply happened at the same time.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

xx

by richachampion » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:03 am
thanks. very crisp and precise analysis.

Can we also discuss evidence for / evidence of in terms of their idiomatic existence?

According to the Ron Purewal:
"evidence for" → This is used for some argument or position, not for some thing that once existed.

But I didn't completely understand the above.
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
Join the discussion

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:17 pm
richachampion wrote:thanks. very crisp and precise analysis.

Can we also discuss evidence for / evidence of in terms of their idiomatic existence?

According to the Ron Purewal:
"evidence for" → This is used for some argument or position, not for some thing that once existed.

But I didn't completely understand the above.
That certainly seems right to me. Consider the following sentences:

"The gun is a damning piece of evidence for the prosecution." (Whom is the evidence for? The prosecution.)

However, if we swapped "of" for "for" we'd change the meaning. "The gun is a damning piece of evidence of the prosecution." Now it sounds as though the gun is evidence that the prosecution exists.

Similarly:

"Can you provide evidence for your assertion that Tim is guilty?" (What are you providing evidence for? Your assertion/claim that Time is guilty.)

Contrast the above with: "Can you provide evidence of your assertion that Tim is guilty?" Now it sounds as though we want proof that you made an assertion.

So if we're trying to communicate that there's evidence that something exists, we'd use "evidence of." (Or "evidence that")

But if we're trying to find evidence to support a claim, we'd write "evidence for."
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by richachampion » Sat Sep 09, 2017 3:36 am
Sir, I took a couple of days to understand, but still, couldn't understand why the past continuous tense is wrong. After all, civilizations wouldn't have evolved in a day, but in a continuity of many years.

So, I couldn't understand why the past continuous tense is wrong as it doesn't conveys a nonsensical meaning.
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1