Ecological problems

Expert replies

avenus: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 238; Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:44 am; Thanked: 9 times

by avenus » Thu May 28, 2009 12:24 am

The solution to any environmental problem that is not the result of government mismanagement can only lie in major changes in consumer habits. But major changes in consumer habits will occur only if such changes are economically enticing. As a result, few serious ecological problems will be solved unless the solutions are made economically enticing.

The conclusion drawn in the argument above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

(A) Few serious ecological problems are the result of government mismanagement.
(B) No environmental problems that stem from government mismanagement have solutions that are economically feasible.
(C) Major changes in consumer habits can be made economically enticing.
(D) Most environmental problems that are not the result of government mismanagement are major ecological problems.
(E) Few serious ecological problems can be solved by major changes in consumer habits

Like this post

Source: Beat The GMAT — Critical Reasoning | Thu May 28, 2009 12:24 am

scoobydooby: Legendary Member; Posts: 1035; Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member; Thanked: 104 times

by scoobydooby » Thu May 28, 2009 3:28 am

i like A

A. non govt environmental mismgmt can be solved only by major changes in consumer habits. if some serious ecological problems can be solved without major changes in consumer habits, they must not be non-govt mismanagment=>govt mismanagement

B. economic feasibility is out of scope

C. doesnt affect the argument

D. out of scope

E. we do not know if a lot/few can be solved by major changes in consumer habits

Like this post

avenus: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 238; Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:44 am; Thanked: 9 times

by avenus » Thu May 28, 2009 3:42 am

scoobydooby wrote:i like A
A. non govt environmental mismgmt can be solved only by major changes in consumer habits. if some serious ecological problems can be solved without major changes in consumer habits, they must not be non-govt mismanagment=>govt mismanagement
B. economic feasibility is out of scope
C. doesnt affect the argument
D. out of scope
E. we do not know if a lot/few can be solved by major changes in consumer habits

At last!! An answer accompanied by a full explanation. Thanks. Any other bets? I'll disclose the OA a bit later.

.

Like this post

2010gmat: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 371; Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:48 am; Thanked: 27 times; GMAT Score:740

by 2010gmat » Thu May 28, 2009 4:05 am

.. let me also try with explanation...

IMO C

author argues that "result of government mismanagement can only lie in major changes in consumer habits. But major changes in consumer habits will occur only if such changes are economically enticing."

ONLY lie in changes ... changes can ONLY happen
wat if major changes in habits cannot be made enticing...?? the argument will fall apart...

hope it helps

Like this post

pratyush.mathur: Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts; Posts: 6; Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 3:44 am

by pratyush.mathur » Thu May 28, 2009 4:17 am

I feel D is correct...

Like this post

avenus: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 238; Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:44 am; Thanked: 9 times

by avenus » Thu May 28, 2009 4:25 am

pratyush.mathur wrote:I feel D is correct...

why??

.

Like this post

rahulg83: Legendary Member; Posts: 575; Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:58 amFollowed by: 4 members; Location: India; Thanked: 18 times; GMAT Score:710

Re: Ecological problems

by rahulg83 » Thu May 28, 2009 5:28 am

avenus wrote:The solution to any environmental problem that is not the result of government mismanagement can only lie in major changes in consumer habits. But major changes in consumer habits will occur only if such changes are economically enticing. As a result, few serious ecological problems will be solved unless the solutions are made economically enticing.

The conclusion drawn in the argument above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

(A) Few serious ecological problems are the result of government mismanagement.
(B) No environmental problems that stem from government mismanagement have solutions that are economically feasible.
(C) Major changes in consumer habits can be made economically enticing.
(D) Most environmental problems that are not the result of government mismanagement are major ecological problems.
(E) Few serious ecological problems can be solved by major changes in consumer habits

Thanks for posting few nice questions avenus
I too feel D is correct. Conclusion says that few serious ecological problems will be solved unless the solutions are made economically enticing. That means most of the serious ecological problems will not be solved. And the premise says that solution to any env problem that is not the result of governmnet management is blah blah blah..so what kind of problems are we talking about? The problems which are not caused by government management, and these are the serious ecological problems which can be solved if consumer changes are economically enticing.

Like this post

Domnu: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 385; Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:55 pm; Thanked: 11 times; GMAT Score:740

by Domnu » Thu May 28, 2009 5:41 am

IMO, [spoiler]it's between C and D. But in the end, I think C would prevail.

A) is not implied anywhere.
B) is extreme and not implied.
D) The word 'most' throws me off here.
E) This goes against the conclusion and stated premises, so there's no way that this answer is right.[/spoiler]

Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T

Like this post

avenus: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 238; Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:44 am; Thanked: 9 times

by avenus » Fri May 29, 2009 8:29 am

scoobydooby wrote:i like A
A. non govt environmental mismgmt can be solved only by major changes in consumer habits. if some serious ecological problems can be solved without major changes in consumer habits, they must not be non-govt mismanagment=>govt mismanagement
B. economic feasibility is out of scope
C. doesnt affect the argument
D. out of scope
E. we do not know if a lot/few can be solved by major changes in consumer habits

well done. OA is A

Like this post

nicolette: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 197; Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 4:03 am

by nicolette » Sun May 15, 2016 2:58 pm

choice A should be the correct choice

Like this post

Post new topic Post Reply

• Page 1 of 1

GMAT Course Reviews

560 reviews

1168 reviews

431 reviews

359 reviews

147 reviews

5/5

5 Star (560 Reviews)

"Target Test Prep is the closest to the official version of the GMAT exam, about 99% accuracy in terms of the quality and quantity of information. The course has excellently created singular sets of focused lessons and tests for every possible topic that one could come across in the official GMAT exam."

"The TTP course maximizes the efficiency of the time you spend studying. It will take time and effort but I could almost guarantee that if you complete the course exactly as it is laid out you will get an amazing score. They also have a very responsive team willing to help with any questions you might have."

"TTP has two things that I think no other test prep company offers: A teaching approach that reinforces understanding and an attitude that will give you the mental preparedness needed to succeed on the test. TTP gives you a deep understanding of the concept you need to know while teaching you how to think."

Write a Review