BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

either division X or division Y

Expert replies
by sanju09 » Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:13 am
Each employee of Company Z is an employee of either division X or division Y, but not both. If each division has some part-time employees, is the ratio of the number of full-time employees to the number of part-time employees greater for division X than for Company Z?

(1) The ratio of the number of full-time employees to the number of part-time employees is less for division Y than for Company Z.

(2) More than half of the full-time employees of Company Z are employees of division X, and more than half of the part-time employees of Company Z are employees of division Y.



OA D
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: either division X or division Y

by Vemuri » Fri Apr 17, 2009 10:07 am
Lets assume,
Division X has = X full-time employees & x part-time employees
Division Y has = Y full-time employees & y part-time employees

Question is asking if X/x > (X+x)/(Y+y)

Stmt 1: Y/y < (X+Y)/(x+y)
==> xY+yY < yX+ yY
==> xY < yX
==> Y/y < X/x
I am not sure how to intrepret this inequality :roll:

Stmt 2: X > (X+Y)/2 & Y > (x+y)/2

Man...I give up ... I am yawning & this question is making it worse for me....time to go to bed :wink:
Join the discussion

by cubicle_bound_misfit » Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:08 pm
lets have 4 sets

XP, XF
YP , YF P= pt time, F=fl time

q is asking

XF/XP > (XF+YF)/(XP+YP)

simplifying q is asking

XF/XP > YF/YP ( cross multiplying and canceeling equal terms)
( when cross multiplying no term can be taken negative even in recession-struck market )
stmt 1 when solved yield the same suff

stmt 2 says YP> XP
XF>YF

hence automatically XF/XP > YF/YP suff

Hence D
Cubicle Bound Misfit
Join the discussion

by cubicle_bound_misfit » Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:42 pm
dear sanju,

is that right approach. Please enlighten.
Cubicle Bound Misfit
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:16 am
You are perfect Mr Misfit. Let me sing in the same timbre:

Xf/Yf is the full time in division X/Y, and Xp/Yp is part time in division X/Y, X, Y, and Z are number of employees in X, Y, and Z.

X = Xf + Xp

Y = Yf + Yp

Z = X + Y

For (1), Yf/Yp < Zf/Zp, as a reparation, Xf/Xp should be greater than Zf/Zp. Sufficient.

For (2), More than ½ of Zf /less than ½ of the Zp should be greater than Zf/Zp. Sufficient.

My explanation has shared thoughts of an unknown zone.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion