• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions
25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• FREE GMAT Exam
Know how you'd score today for $0 Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 1 Hour Free BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Award-winning private GMAT tutoring Register now and save up to$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

## eating beets

tagged by:

This topic has 2 expert replies and 10 member replies
Joined
17 Mar 2010
Posted:
1309 messages
Followed by:
5 members
33
Test Date:
july/august 2010
Target GMAT Score:
700+
GMAT Score:
neve

#### eating beets

Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:55 am
Eating beets significantly lowers the risk of cancer, according to an article in a nutritional magazine. The article refers to a study that found that people who consumed one or more beets per day were half as likely to be diagnosed with the disease as people who did not.
Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument in the magazine article?
A) Another study found that people who consumed one tablespoon of flax seed oil per day were more than four times less likely to be diagnosed with cancer as those who did not.
B) Participants in the study reported consuming no vegetables other than beets.
C) The study was only conducted in one city.
D) In another experiment, cancer patients who ate one or more beets per day were no more likely to recover than those who ate no beets.
E) The participants in the study who ate beets were more likely to exercise regularly than those who did not eat beets

thephoenix Legendary Member
Joined
17 Nov 2009
Posted:
1560 messages
Followed by:
4 members
137
Target GMAT Score:
750
Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:03 am
the conclusion is that Eating beets significantly lowers the risk of cancer

evidence is people who consumed one or more beets per day were half as likely to be diagnosed with the disease as people who did not.

so clearly author assumes that eating beets is the only reason for less likeliness of people being diagnosed with the disease

to weaken this assumption we need to prove that something else may be the reason
choice E does that
and therefore is correct
it states that they do excercise also

gmat.cracker24 Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Joined
06 Apr 2010
Posted:
19 messages
Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:19 am
IMO (E)

A:One tbsp of flax etc. is out of scope,we are concerned with beet only
B:This emphasizes that lowering of cancer is due to beet only amongts all veg
C:No. of cities is irrelevant
D:Its the likelyhood of cancer rather than its recuperative powers that is under consideration
E:It weakens as we are not sure its beets or the exercises that help reduces the risk

ironstar37 Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Joined
19 Nov 2009
Posted:
14 messages
Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:03 pm
IMO (E). If the participants who ate beets also exercised regularly, this exercise could be the cause of lowering the risk of cancer.

(A) (B) (C) are out of scope.

(D) is referring to patients who already have cancer. Study is referring to the risk of getting cancer.

akahuja143 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
20 Apr 2009
Posted:
182 messages
Followed by:
1 members
1
Target GMAT Score:
700
Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:09 pm
IMO E to weaken X - causes Y we just need to show that not X but Z causes Y, E does it

### GMAT/MBA Expert

grockit_andrea GMAT Instructor
Joined
12 Aug 2009
Posted:
357 messages
Followed by:
7 members
128
Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:29 pm
This is a classic causation/correlation argument: the conclusion is based on the faulty assumption that just because there is a correlation between X and Y, X must be causing Y. One of the best ways to weaken an argument like that is to show that there's some other outside factor that is in fact responsible for Y, and that happens to be correlated to X. Choice E does that.

_________________
Andrea A.
Grockit Tutor
https://www.grockit.com

analyst218 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
05 Feb 2010
Posted:
140 messages
3
Test Date:
FEB 2010
Target GMAT Score:
800
GMAT Score:
720
Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:09 pm
grockit_andrea wrote:
This is a classic causation/correlation argument: the conclusion is based on the faulty assumption that just because there is a correlation between X and Y, X must be causing Y. One of the best ways to weaken an argument like that is to show that there's some other outside factor that is in fact responsible for Y, and that happens to be correlated to X. Choice E does that.
I got E too, but I have a question.
Couldn't this also be a sample size- generalization error?
the passage draws a conclusion abt risk for all ppl based on a study conducted
among sample of ppl, and if that pool of sample is skewed or biased (C ).
Can somebody explain why C is out of scope besides 'E is a better answer'?

mituag Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Joined
24 Jan 2007
Posted:
2 messages
Tue Apr 13, 2010 10:07 pm
analyst218 wrote:
I got E too, but I have a question.
Couldn't this also be a sample size- generalization error?
the passage draws a conclusion abt risk for all ppl based on a study conducted
among sample of ppl, and if that pool of sample is skewed or biased (C ).
Can somebody explain why C is out of scope besides 'E is a better answer'?
Lets look at C.

C) The study was only conducted in one city.

First question that should come to your mind is "so what?"
How does this weaken an argument that eating beets "lowers the risk of cancer"? It may be that for that one city this is true but in general it may not be. Looking at this we cannot surely say that this weakens the argument.

When it comes to "E", it provides and alternate reason which weakens the argument stating eating beets is not the only reason which reduces the risk of cancer.

Also I think C is attacking the premise which is wrong. E is successfully attacking the assumption.

Hope that helped.

paddle_sweep Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
07 Apr 2010
Posted:
379 messages
3
Target GMAT Score:
720
Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:28 am
"E" does not show any relationship with cancer. It does not say that exercising has any relationship with cancer. How can "E" be correct?

### GMAT/MBA Expert

grockit_andrea GMAT Instructor
Joined
12 Aug 2009
Posted:
357 messages
Followed by:
7 members
128
Sun Apr 18, 2010 5:18 am
The argument says that people who eat beets are less prone to developing cancer, so eating beets must prevent cancer. Choice E says that people who eat beets (at least the people who matter for our purpose: the ones in the study) are more likely to exercise. So maybe there's actually no relationship between beets and cancer. Maybe the relationship is between exercise and cancer, and eating beets just happens to be correlated to exercising. That's how choice E weakens.

_________________
Andrea A.
Grockit Tutor
https://www.grockit.com

vscid Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
01 Dec 2007
Posted:
212 messages
5
Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:39 am
"E" does not show any relationship with cancer. It does not say that exercising has any relationship with cancer. How can "E" be correct?
It doesn't. But it raises doubts on the validity of the conclusion that states a relation between beet and cancer.

_________________
The GMAT is indeed adaptable. Whenever I answer RC, it proficiently 'adapts' itself to mark my 'right' answer 'wrong'.

paddle_sweep Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
07 Apr 2010
Posted:
379 messages
3
Target GMAT Score:
720
Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:21 pm
Thanks for the clarifications provided. Understood the reasoning behind the correct answer now.

Cheers

Joined
14 Sep 2008
Posted:
1261 messages
27
Target GMAT Score:
801
GMAT Score:
570
Thu Apr 22, 2010 4:26 pm
Cause - Effect, E brings in other possibility. Therefore, E is correct

### Top First Responders*

1 GMATGuruNY 71 first replies
2 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma... 48 first replies
3 Brent@GMATPrepNow 37 first replies
4 Jay@ManhattanReview 26 first replies
5 ErikaPrepScholar 10 first replies
* Only counts replies to topics started in last 30 days
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members

### Most Active Experts

1 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

129 posts
2 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

116 posts
3 Jeff@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

106 posts
4 Max@Math Revolution

Math Revolution

92 posts
5 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

92 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts