BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

easy ds question with weird wording

Expert replies
by missrochelle » Thu Aug 26, 2010 6:32 pm
23. og12

The profit from the sale of an appliance increases, though not proportionally, with the number of units sold. Did the profit exceed $4mm on the sales of 380,000 units?

1) The profit exceeded $2mm on sales of 200,000 units.
2) The profit exceeded $5mm on sales of 350,000 units.


OA. B


When i looked at the problem, i tried ot solve stmt 1 as an inequality. 200,000(profit per unit) > 2,000,000.

therefore (profit per unit) > 10. Substituting 11 as the minimum I get 380,000 units * 11 = $4,180,000 as the minimum. So I thought stmt was also sufficient.

Is the takeaway here that "THOUGH NOT PROPORTIONALLY" means you cant divide out per unit price because the price varies?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by 4GMAT_Mumbai » Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:08 pm
missrochelle wrote: therefore (profit per unit) > 10. Substituting 11 as the minimum I get 380,000 units * 11 = $4,180,000 as the minimum. So I thought stmt was also sufficient.
Several not-so-right assumptions. If it is not 10, why cannot it be 10.2 ? Even if it is 11, it would not be 11 on all the 0.38m units ...
missrochelle wrote:Is the takeaway here that "THOUGH NOT PROPORTIONALLY" means you cant divide out per unit price because the price varies?
The takeaway here is that when the # of units increases, profit DOES increase but not in an uniform manner.

A geometric interpretation: You will not be able to plot a straight line with 'units' on the x-axis and 'profit' on the y-axis. It would be a jagged line with varying slopes.

Which is why 2 is sufficient. If the profit with 350,000 units exceeds $5m, the profit from the sale of 380,000 units will definitely exceed $4m (in fact, it will definitely be higher than $5m itself - It could be very little - $5,000,010 or very high - $10m, say).

Hope this helps. Thanks.
Naveenan Ramachandran
4GMAT, Dadar(W) & Ghatkopar(W), Mumbai
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:25 pm
Here, by doing the above calculations you are assuming that the profit is increasing proportionally with the number of units sold when actually the main statement is just saying that there is an increase in profit with the number of units sold.
Consider just statement (1).
It says that profit exceeds $2mm on sales of 200,000 units.
It may be that profit is $2.000001mm on sales of 200,000 units, $2.0000015mm on sales of 200,001 units, $2.0000016mm on sales of 200,002 units and so on.
In such a case profit may not exceed $4mm on the sales of 380,000 units.
So statement (1) alone is not sufficient.

Next consider statement (2) alone.
It is already exceeding $5mm on sales of 350, 000 units .
So obviously, since profits are not going to decrease, for sale of 380, 000 units profit will exceed $4mm.
So (2) alone is sufficient.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion