BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

ds - value question

Expert replies

by Abhijeet03 » Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:09 am
here say we have 3 variable as in x,y,z .where x>y>z
as per the statement1 :- x+y =12 And
as per the statement2 :- y+z = 12
Subtracting both Equation we will get x-z = 1
But we don't know what is x or z , This make for the Answer as E
Join the discussion

by rajeshsinghgmat » Mon Feb 04, 2013 12:20 am
E in answEr.

5.25(a),5.75(b),6.25(c)


5.2(a),5.8(b),6.2(c)
Join the discussion

by vongochao » Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:25 am
please remember that 3pcs that are unequal length!

so please choose E!
Join the discussion

by aks9389 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:23 am
The question clearly states that the three pieces are unequal in length.So,we cant assume 6 and 6.Even in unequal lengths,there will be numerous options.
Nijeesh wrote:why can't it be C

(1) The combined length of the longer two pieces of rope is 12 meters.


this statements gives Y+Z=12, so let say 6+6=12 (length of longer ropes 6 and 6)

(2) The combined length of the shorter two pieces of rope is 11 meters.

this gives us X+Y=11 or X+Z=11 , now X can be only 5..so 5+6=11

so shorter rope length is 5

another set of values
1) Y+Z=12, say 7+5=12 (longer ropes 7 and 5)
2) X+z=11, here we can't have X as 6 (to make X+Z as 11 we need X as 6 and Z=5 from (1) )since according to the given data..these are shorter ropes..

so only possible values are Y+Z=12, 6+6=12 (length of longer ropes 6 and 6)
X+Y=11 or X+Z=11 , so 5+6=11


is this not right ?
Join the discussion

by jjk3431 » Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:15 am
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:
cgc wrote:If a rope is cut into three pieces of unequal length, what is the length of the shortest of these pieces of rope?

(1) The combined length of the longer two pieces of rope is 12 meters.

(2) The combined length of the shorter two pieces of rope is 11 meters.

for rope x + y + z = a

1. x + y = 12

2. y + z = 11

c. can you combine the two equations to create another separate equation? For example...
y = 12 -x
(12-x) + z = 11


Are these not distinct equations to satisfy the equation/variable rule?

Please help explain.

thanks,
Hi,

you still only have 3 distinct equations for your 4 variables; you cannot create the 4th equation as you've attempted.

What you've done is a more complicated variation of taking:

y = x + 3

and

4 = 4

and combining them to get:

y + 4 = x + 7

and then using:

y = x + 3
and
y + 4 = x + 7

to solve for x and y; you'll end up with 0=0 if you try to solve those equations.

You'll find if you try to solve the equations you've set up, the same thing will happen; since the third equation is a combination of the first two, it's not distinct.

So, here's the rule:

to solve for a system of n variables, one requires n distinct, linear, equations.

This rule is THE most powerful tool for data sufficiency; the better you know it (and all the exceptions), the fewer calculations you'll have to make on DS questions.
Hey Stuart,

I totally agree with your answer and the rule.

I was just a little unclear with the portion of your description where you say:
y = x + 3

and

4 = 4

and combining them to get:

y + 4 = x + 7

and then using:

y = x + 3
and
y + 4 = x + 7

Could you explain that portion?
Join the discussion

by ndqv » Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:07 pm
3 pieces with 3 lengths: a<b<c
2 stats: using each of them independently obviously cannot figure out the shortest length.
Combine 2 stats:
a+b=11
b+c=12
If the lengths are integers => combining 2 stats can solve the issue
However, nowhere in the question did the author mention that criterion.

Hence, choose E
Join the discussion

by sahilbilga » Sun Jan 12, 2014 8:11 am
Answer is E because from the given data:
a+b+c = d
a+12 =d
11 +c =d

we cannot solve 4 variables with three equations
Join the discussion

by jaspreetsra » Wed Oct 22, 2014 6:03 pm
must be E.
Last edited by jaspreetsra on Mon Nov 03, 2014 10:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Mon Oct 27, 2014 11:27 am
cgc wrote:If a rope is cut into three pieces of unequal length, what is the length of the shortest of these pieces of rope?

(1) The combined length of the longer two pieces of rope is 12 meters.

(2) The combined length of the shorter two pieces of rope is 11 meters.
Let's sort this out arithmetically and algebraically.

Taking the two statements together, I could have either of these possibilities:

Longest piece = 6.1
Middle piece = 5.9
Shortest piece = 5.1

OR

Longest piece = 6.2
Middle piece = 5.8
Shortest piece = 5.2

So the two statements together are INSUFFICIENT.

Algebraically, we have the equations

a + b = 12
b + c = 11

This is TWO equations for THREE variables, so we can't determine a unique value for any of the three variables.
Join the discussion

by deepak4mba » Mon Apr 02, 2018 11:14 pm
Join the discussion