Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

ds

Expert replies
by blaster » Fri Dec 17, 2010 3:40 am
Image
can someone please explain the first statement? statement 2 is clear.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by gmatmachoman » Fri Dec 17, 2010 3:57 am
st1 :
X= - |X|

This means that X will ALWAYS be a negative number irrespective the sign.

ex :
case 1 : x= 3
|X| = |3| = 3
Since X= - |X| ------> X = - |3| = -3

case 2

X = -3
|X| = | -3| = 3
Since X= - |X| ------> X = - |-3| = -3

But the prompt asks for a "specific value" ....so st 1 in insufficient

St 2 is sufficient

Pick B
Join the discussion

by goyalsau » Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:37 am
gmatmachoman wrote:st1 :
X= - |X|

This means that X will ALWAYS be a negative number irrespective the sign.

ex :
case 1 : x= 3
|X| = |3| = 3
Since X= - |X| ------> X = - |3| = -3
I agree with you answer, and i have some where in the forum that when x = - | x |

X is always negative,

but in your example you are considering a +ve value of x

Don't you think your both statements contradict.
Saurabh Goyal
[email protected]
-------------------------


EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Fri Dec 17, 2010 8:07 am
x = -|x|
x = -|x| implies |x| = -x, which is nothing but the definition of absolute value of x whenever x < 0. Thus this statement tells us x is negative.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by fskilnik@GMATH » Fri Dec 17, 2010 8:12 am
goyalsau wrote:This means that X will ALWAYS be a negative number irrespective the sign.
Hi goyalsau!

Watch out, |x| = -x does NOT mean x is negative... |x| = -x means that x is NULL OR NEGATIVE.

goyalsau wrote: Don't you think your both statements contradict.
I´ve already explained lengthly in another BTG post some WRONG understanding on this matter (made by Experts, too). To put it shortly: the fact that one of the statements ALONE is sufficient to answer the question asked (in this case, sttm 2) makes the Data Sufficiency problem to be FINISHED BEFORE the need to use both statements together. In THIS scenario, statements (1) and (2) does NOT need to be "coherent", "harmonious", whatever.

(It´s not a matter of opinion here. It´s a matter of mathematical logic.)

Best Regards,
Fabio.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion

by fskilnik@GMATH » Fri Dec 17, 2010 8:15 am
Rahul@gurome wrote:|x| = -x, which is nothing but the definition of absolute value of x whenever x < 0. Thus this statement tells us x is negative.
The usual definition of |x| really is:

|x| = x if x is positive or null
|x| = -x if x is negative

BUT this is only because it would be less "elegant" to define as:

|x| = x if x is positive
|x| = -x if x is negative or null

OR EVEN

|x| = x if x is positive or null
|x| = -x if x is negative or null

In other words, 0 is the only real number that coincides with its opposite (0 = -0), therefore we have to take special care when dealing with 0 when modulus is concerned.

Regards,
Fabio.

P.S.: it´s not a matter of opinion, here. If you try x=0 in the statement |x| = -x you will see that it makes the statement TRUE. In other words, x=0 satisfies statement (1). PERIOD.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Fri Dec 17, 2010 8:22 am
/x/ is always positive hence -/x/ will be always negative

am i right experts?
A SMALL TOWN GUY
Join the discussion

by fskilnik@GMATH » Fri Dec 17, 2010 8:36 am
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:/x/ is always positive hence -/x/ will be always negative

am i right experts?
NO!

|x| is always NULL OR POSITIVE therefore -|x| is always NULL or NEGATIVE!

Important:

01. |x| will be zero if and only if x is zero.
02. -|x| will be zero if and only if x is zero.

Got it? :)
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Fri Dec 17, 2010 8:55 am
thats correct thanks sir
A SMALL TOWN GUY
Join the discussion

by fskilnik@GMATH » Fri Dec 17, 2010 9:06 am
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:thats correct thanks sir
My pleasure, pradeepkaushal9518.

Let me ask you a question just for both of us be sure we understood each other, may I?

The question is: If in a certain question the examiner asks whether sqrt(-x*|x|) < 9 (where sqrt = square root), please tell me:

01. What is implicitly given in relation to x? (I mean: is x certainly positive? Certainly negative? etc)

02. What are the values of x that satisfies (the implicit condition on item 01. above AND) the inequality given?

(In other words, if you would "simplifly the question asked", you would get this: "Is A < x <= B ?" and I want to know the values of A and B...)

I am waiting your answers, ok?!

(Don´t be stressed. They are HARD, but if you get them right OR if you understand my after-your-response explanation, THEN you will have seen a "bigger picture" and I will consider "the case closed"...ok?)

Regards,
Fabio.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion

by fskilnik@GMATH » Fri Dec 17, 2010 10:18 am
Well, I don´t want to make you (pradeepkaushal9518) unconfortable, nor anyone, so let me show you (all) what I have in mind!

Question 01. From the fact that the square root is a radical with an even index (2), that means the radicand must be positive or null, therefore we have to assume that -x*|x| >=0 and that means x is NULL or NEGATIVE.

Conclusion: the answer for question 01 is "x is implicitly assumed to be negative or zero."

More detailed explanation is below:

-------------------------------------------------------------
Please note that

> if x is null, -x*|x| = 0 and this is ok to be "under the square root" (that is, to be the radicand of a radical with even index) ;

> if x is negative, -x is positive and |x| is also positive, therefore -x*|x| is positive and, again, this is ok to be "under the square root".

> If x is positive, then |x| is positive BUT -x is negative, therefore -x*|x| is negative and this is a not-allowed scenario.
-------------------------------------------------------------


Question 02: assuming (as you should) that x is negative or null (as explained in question 01´s answer, above), we know that |x| = -x, therefore:

sqrt(-x*|x|) = sqrt (-x*(-x)) = sqrt (x^2) = |x| = -x, therefore -x < 9 implies x > -9 !!!

Conclusion: we know (from question 01) that x < = 0 and (from question 01 and 02) that x > -9, therefore we have:

-9 < x <= 0, and hence I can conclude the values of A and B I´ve asked for!!


Please feel free (all of you) to ask me if something is not 100% understood, ok?

Regards,
Fabio.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion

by goyalsau » Fri Dec 17, 2010 7:45 pm
Thanks Fabio,

Great Question and Even a much better explanation,

x = - | x | { When x is negative and Zero }

I must say Zero is creating a lot of problems............
Saurabh Goyal
[email protected]
-------------------------


EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
Join the discussion