Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

ds

Expert replies
by ketkoag » Sun May 10, 2009 3:06 am
please slove
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: ds

by Vemuri » Sun May 10, 2009 4:56 am
IMO A

Stmt1: The market value of the car depreciates 20% every year. So, 2 year back, the market value was = 6000*(1-1/5) ==> 6000*4/5 ==> $4800. One year back the market value was = 4800*4/5 ==> $3840. This year the market value is = 3840*4/5 ==> $3072. Sufficient.

Stmt2: Firstly, I don't like the way this statement is constructed. How am I to assume the same year the car was manufactured? When dealing with DS question, each statement should be dealt with separately. This statement is tempting me to bring information from Statement 1 (which is not correct). Clearly, this statement is not sufficient because I do not know which year the statement is talking about & I also do not know what the depreciation value of the car is or the original price of the car. With no such details, this statement is not sufficient.
Join the discussion

by PAB2706 » Tue May 12, 2009 9:04 am
just a small query.....in statement 1 we dont have any information about how many years back the car was bought.....

isn't statement 2 stating wht the question is asking us to find?

pls help me understand...
Join the discussion

by DeepakR » Wed May 13, 2009 3:15 am
#1 the info of when the car was bought is not required since it is already given that the market value of that car 3 years back was $6000.

Also given that the market value deprecated by 20% each year..i.e its value got decreased by 20% each year.

So 3 years back value = $6000
2 years back value = 6000 - 6000 (20/100)=6000(4/5)
1 year back value = 6000*4/5*4/5
Current year value = 6000*4/5*4/5*4/5

#1 is sufficient

#2 Does not give the info about the current market value of the car whose market value was $6000 3 years back. Instead it gives the market value of another car which was manufactured this year.

-Deepak
Join the discussion

by mike22629 » Wed May 13, 2009 7:37 am
This is a poorly constructed question, but I would say E.

In 1.) It tells you that the car depreciates by 20% OF ITS PURCHASE PRICE per year, not that it depreciates by 20% of its current value. We dont not know how old the car was three years ago, so how we can find out its original purchase price?

2.) The second question is poorly worded. How do we know that it is the same car?

I would say E, but if I had to guess, the second statement was copied incorrectly.
Join the discussion