BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Instructors plz help...Inqeuality DS 32

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: Inqeuality DS 32

by ankur_swayam » Sat Oct 03, 2009 8:15 am
ern5231 wrote:32) Is (a^2) b + a (b^2) > 0 ?

(1) a <0

(2) a+b<0
The answer is E
Join the discussion

by ern5231 » Sat Oct 03, 2009 8:50 am
How did you arrive at E? I feel the answer is B
Join the discussion

by glorydefined » Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:01 am
I too think it is B
Join the discussion

by ern5231 » Sat Oct 03, 2009 9:13 pm
Can anyone explain how is it B?
Join the discussion

by sanjana » Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:23 pm
IMO : E

Question :
is (a^2)b + a(b^2) > 0
==>is ab(a+b) > 0

for this to be true we have 2 cases :

1)ab>0 and (a+b) >0
2)ab<0 and (a+b) <0

Statement 1
Tells us a<0 but gives no information on b,hence insufficient

statement 2
Tells us (a+b) < 0 ,
This tells us nothig about a and b individually so we cant say if ab >0 or ab < 0,hence insufficient
Pick numbers to verify :
a=-1,b=-5 ==> -1-5 <0
a=-7,b=2 ==> =7+2 <0

Together again,

We know a<0 and we know a+b <0 but we dont know the sign of b and hence both statements togetjer are also insufficient.
Join the discussion

by ern5231 » Sun Oct 04, 2009 5:36 am
Is (a^2) b + a (b^2) > 0 ?

(1) a <0

(2) a+b<0

Can we follow this approach -

(a^2)b>-a(b^2)
Hence, Is a>-b?

(1) does not make it suff
(2) a<-b looks suff

Hence B. Am I going wrong anywhere?
Join the discussion

by umaa » Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:57 am
ern5231 wrote:Is (a^2) b + a (b^2) > 0 ?

(1) a <0

(2) a+b<0

Can we follow this approach -

(a^2)b>-a(b^2)
Hence, Is a>-b?

(1) does not make it suff
(2) a<-b looks suff

Hence B. Am I going wrong anywhere?
IMO E.

We can write (a^2) b + a (b^2) > 0 as ab(a+b) > 0.

a+b<0. it means,

a b
- -
- +
+ -

There are three possibilities.

If one is negative and the other is positive, the answer might be negative.

But if both are negative, the answer will be positive.

Since we're getting 2 kind of answers B is not sufficient.

Even if you take both the statements, you will get 2 answers. So, both the statements together are not sufficient.
What we think, we become
Join the discussion

by ern5231 » Thu Oct 08, 2009 8:11 pm
Thanks Sanjana and Umaa. Your explanations look good but can you point out the mistake with my approach?
Join the discussion

by crackgmat007 » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:15 pm
ern5231 wrote:Thanks Sanjana and Umaa. Your explanations look good but can you point out the mistake with my approach?
In the rephrase. Since you dont know whether a or be is negative or positive, you need to consider different possibilities.

IMO Rephrase is ab(a+b)>0

1. We dont the the sign of b
2. Given (a+b)<0. We dont know the sign of ab

1&2

From stmt 1, we know a<0. But we still dont know sign of b. Hence E.
Join the discussion