BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS Practice test question #10

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by aim-wsc » Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:50 am
are you sure the series of questions you just posted are not discussed earlier?

Do use search feature & kindly add keywords in the title of the thread so that it'd help other members search /seek your thread in future :)
Join the discussion

by California4jx » Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:20 am
IMO: D

whats OA ? - i'll explain afterwards.
Join the discussion

by parallel_chase » Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:50 pm
I think the answer should be C.

lxl = y-z ?

Statement I

x+y=z

x=z-y
-x=y-z

Insufficient.


Statement II

x<0
we dont know anything about y and z.

Insufficient.

Combining I & II

x<0
-x=y-z

lxl=y-z

hence sufficient.
Join the discussion

discuss explanation by parallel_chase

by ashish1354 » Fri Aug 29, 2008 11:56 pm
if we deduce -x=y-z
from 1 then it is sufficient to say that y-z is not =lxl

please suggest if i am wrong
so answer is A[/list]
Join the discussion

by sumithshah » Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:33 pm
whats the OA here guys?
Join the discussion

it cant be a

by Aspirant008 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:43 pm
-x = y -z

it cant be A.. as

x can be more than 0 also..
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:06 pm
Even if x is greater than 0, |x| should lead to the same value in case of -x or +x.

Please correct me if I am wrong. Answer should be A
Join the discussion

by rosh26 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:38 am
From the stem: x=y-z if x is positive; x= z-y or x+y=z if negative

Stmt 1: x+y = z

But it is unknown whether x is positive or negative - INSUFF

Stmt 2:

x is negative -INSUFF

Stmts 1& 2, x+y=z, and x is neg - SUFF

Answer should be C.

What is OA???
Join the discussion

by mim3 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:47 pm
Might as well throw my two cents in...

I think it's A.

1. x+y=z
You can manipulate the first statement to get:
x= z-y
multiplying both sides by -1 we get:
-x=y-z
The opposite of x is the same thing as the absolute value of x, so 1 is sufficient.

2. x<0
Doesn't tell us anything. we can pick any numbers or x, y or z. Insufficient.

so, IMO A
Join the discussion

by gmatguy16 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:56 pm
imo c,mission mba oa please?
Join the discussion

Re: discuss explanation by parallel_chase

by nitin86 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 9:18 am
ashish1354 wrote:if we deduce -x=y-z
from 1 then it is sufficient to say that y-z is not =lxl

please suggest if i am wrong
so answer is A[/list]
I think that's not the case.

It depends whether x >= 0 or not.

If X >= 0, then |x| = x
If X<0, then |x| = -x

therefore, if x < o, then -x = y-z is equal to |x| = y-z
but if x>= 0, then -x = y-z is NOT equal to |x| = y-z which is equal to x=y-z

but since we don't know, whether x>=0 or X<0, we can't completely say that statement I solves the problem

I think you are misunderstanding with answer "No" to a question is also an answer ....concept.
Join the discussion

IMO C

by karthikgmat » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:11 pm
definitely its C both the option are required to meet the given conditions..
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sat Nov 29, 2008 11:26 am
The correct answer is (C).

The problem with statement (1) is that we don't know the signs. Let's pick numbers to illustrate.

Does |x| = y - z

Before looking at the statements, let's note that |x| is never negative. So, if z > y, there's no way the two sides can be equal.

(1) x = z - y

Well, we could pick:
x = -3
z = 2
y = 5
(-3 = 2 - 5)

Plugging in:

Does |-3| = 5 - 2? YES

We could also pick:

x = 3
z = 5
y = 2
(3 = 5 - 2)

Does |3| = 2 - 5? NO

Since we can get both a yes and a no answer, (1) is insufficient.

However, if we know that x is negative (statement (2)), then we know from statement (1) that y > z and that the two sides WILL be equal.

Separately the statements are insufficient, together sufficient: choose (C).
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by cramya » Sat Nov 29, 2008 11:39 am
Thanks Stuart!
Join the discussion