Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

DS Practice test question #10

Expert replies
by missionmba » Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:38 am
DS Practice test question
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Mission Mba

Everyone has a will to win but very few have the will to prepare to win
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by aim-wsc » Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:50 am
are you sure the series of questions you just posted are not discussed earlier?

Do use search feature & kindly add keywords in the title of the thread so that it'd help other members search /seek your thread in future :)
Join the discussion

by California4jx » Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:20 am
IMO: D

whats OA ? - i'll explain afterwards.
Join the discussion

by parallel_chase » Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:50 pm
I think the answer should be C.

lxl = y-z ?

Statement I

x+y=z

x=z-y
-x=y-z

Insufficient.


Statement II

x<0
we dont know anything about y and z.

Insufficient.

Combining I & II

x<0
-x=y-z

lxl=y-z

hence sufficient.
Join the discussion

discuss explanation by parallel_chase

by ashish1354 » Fri Aug 29, 2008 11:56 pm
if we deduce -x=y-z
from 1 then it is sufficient to say that y-z is not =lxl

please suggest if i am wrong
so answer is A[/list]
Join the discussion

by sumithshah » Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:33 pm
whats the OA here guys?
Join the discussion

it cant be a

by Aspirant008 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:43 pm
-x = y -z

it cant be A.. as

x can be more than 0 also..
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:06 pm
Even if x is greater than 0, |x| should lead to the same value in case of -x or +x.

Please correct me if I am wrong. Answer should be A
Join the discussion

by rosh26 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:38 am
From the stem: x=y-z if x is positive; x= z-y or x+y=z if negative

Stmt 1: x+y = z

But it is unknown whether x is positive or negative - INSUFF

Stmt 2:

x is negative -INSUFF

Stmts 1& 2, x+y=z, and x is neg - SUFF

Answer should be C.

What is OA???
Join the discussion

by mim3 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:47 pm
Might as well throw my two cents in...

I think it's A.

1. x+y=z
You can manipulate the first statement to get:
x= z-y
multiplying both sides by -1 we get:
-x=y-z
The opposite of x is the same thing as the absolute value of x, so 1 is sufficient.

2. x<0
Doesn't tell us anything. we can pick any numbers or x, y or z. Insufficient.

so, IMO A
Join the discussion

by gmatguy16 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:56 pm
imo c,mission mba oa please?
Join the discussion

Re: discuss explanation by parallel_chase

by nitin86 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 9:18 am
ashish1354 wrote:if we deduce -x=y-z
from 1 then it is sufficient to say that y-z is not =lxl

please suggest if i am wrong
so answer is A[/list]
I think that's not the case.

It depends whether x >= 0 or not.

If X >= 0, then |x| = x
If X<0, then |x| = -x

therefore, if x < o, then -x = y-z is equal to |x| = y-z
but if x>= 0, then -x = y-z is NOT equal to |x| = y-z which is equal to x=y-z

but since we don't know, whether x>=0 or X<0, we can't completely say that statement I solves the problem

I think you are misunderstanding with answer "No" to a question is also an answer ....concept.
Join the discussion

IMO C

by karthikgmat » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:11 pm
definitely its C both the option are required to meet the given conditions..
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sat Nov 29, 2008 11:26 am
The correct answer is (C).

The problem with statement (1) is that we don't know the signs. Let's pick numbers to illustrate.

Does |x| = y - z

Before looking at the statements, let's note that |x| is never negative. So, if z > y, there's no way the two sides can be equal.

(1) x = z - y

Well, we could pick:
x = -3
z = 2
y = 5
(-3 = 2 - 5)

Plugging in:

Does |-3| = 5 - 2? YES

We could also pick:

x = 3
z = 5
y = 2
(3 = 5 - 2)

Does |3| = 2 - 5? NO

Since we can get both a yes and a no answer, (1) is insufficient.

However, if we know that x is negative (statement (2)), then we know from statement (1) that y > z and that the two sides WILL be equal.

Separately the statements are insufficient, together sufficient: choose (C).
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by cramya » Sat Nov 29, 2008 11:39 am
Thanks Stuart!
Join the discussion