DS- OG Quantitative Review #96, help

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:59 pm

DS- OG Quantitative Review #96, help

by nadesai » Mon Aug 16, 2010 6:57 pm
Hi,
I am unable to understand this problem from the OG Quantitative Review 2nd Ed: PLease Help with detailed solution

#96. For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z. Is [x]=0?

(1) -1<x<-0.1
(2) [x+0.5] =1

OA given is A

Thanks in advance
ND
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pm
Thanked: 215 times
Followed by:7 members

by kvcpk » Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:13 am
nadesai wrote:Hi,
I am unable to understand this problem from the OG Quantitative Review 2nd Ed: PLease Help with detailed solution

#96. For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z. Is [x]=0?

(1) -1<x<-0.1
(2) [x+0.5] =1

OA given is A

Thanks in advance
ND
Hi,

Let me try to explain this for you.
[z] represents a "step" function in mathematical terms. Knowledge of this function is not needed here. But, want to let you know what the question is asking for.
[z] gives the least integer greater than or equal to z.
[1]=1
[1.1]=2
[2.3]=4
[-1.2]=-1
[-0.5]=0

Now,
(1) -1<x<-0.1
For any value between -0.1 and -1 [not inclusive], the next greater integer is 0
Hence [x]=0
SUFF

(2) [x+0.5] =1
Let x= 0
[0.5]=1
and [x]=0.. TRUE
Let x= 0.5
[0.5+0.5] = [1]=1
[x] = 1..FALSE
INConsistent. Hence INSUFF

pick A

Hope this helps!!
"Once you start working on something,
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)