BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS: Laura's Income

Expert replies
by kevincanspain » Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:46 am
Laura sells encyclopaedias, and her monthly income has two components, a fixed component of $1000 per month, and a variable component, which is $C for each set of encyclopaedias that she sells in that month over a sales target of n sets, where n>0. How much did she earn in March?

(1) If Laura had sold three fewer sets in March, her income for that month would have been $600 lower than it was.
(2) If Laura had sold 10 sets of encyclopaedias in March, her income for that month would have been over $4000.
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: DS: Laura's Income

by gabriel » Thu Mar 22, 2007 12:24 pm
kevincanspain wrote:Laura sells encyclopaedias, and her monthly income has two components, a fixed component of $1000 per month, and a variable component, which is $C for each set of encyclopaedias that she sells in that month over a sales target of n sets, where n>0. How much did she earn in March?

(1) If Laura had sold three fewer sets in March, her income for that month would have been $600 lower than it was.
(2) If Laura had sold 10 sets of encyclopaedias in March, her income for that month would have been over $4000.
hmm.... i am not sure but i think the answer shuld be E...

from the q stem we get that lauras income is 1000 + C*x.... where x is the no. of encyclopedias she sold sbove the target of n

from the first statement we get ... 1000+C*x- ( 1000 + C*(x-3))=600... that wuld giv the value of C as 200 $... since we dont know the value of x.. so insufficient

from the second statement.... 1000 + C*x>4000... C*x>3000... but since we dont know the value of either C or x... therefore insufficient...

combining both we get x > 15...so insufficient... so E

... but i think i am missing something...
Join the discussion

by f2001290 » Sun May 13, 2007 6:05 am
I will go with A.

What's the OA
Join the discussion

by Nisha1218 » Sun May 13, 2007 7:10 am
I'm going with E because each statement doesn't give us "n" and if we were to combine the statements, then we still can't solve it because we don't have 2 distinct equations with one unknown.
Join the discussion

Re: DS: Laura's Income

by gviren » Mon May 21, 2007 5:15 pm
C cannot be $200 as in that case, statement (2) will not hold true

I think the answer is C.......

Taking 1 , we know that if Laura sells 3 less then the profits are $600 less.
So if all the 3 books are above the sales target of n sets, then c= $200
if 2 books are above the sales target of n sets, then c= $400
if only one is above the sales target of n sets, then c= $600

Now taking 2, if sold 10 sets of encyclopaedias in March, her income for that month would have been over $4000. To support this statement, c can only be $600 as in case of $200 and $400, income for March would be $3000 ($1000 + $200*10) and $4000 ($1000 + $400*10) (assuming that sales target of n sets = 0)



So that means Laura sold only one book in the month of March and her income was $1600

Please let me know if my understanding is wrong
Join the discussion

by Cybermusings » Tue May 22, 2007 12:10 am
Statement I: If Laura sold x-3 sets in March her income would be y – 600 (where x is sets sold by Laura and y is the income earned by Laura). We also know that y is made of two components (1000 + variable component). And we can also make out that x>n (else in both cases i.e. when she sells “x-3” sets and “x” sets Laura’s income would be the same i.e. 1000). However, it is insufficient to determine Laura’s income
Statement II: We can deduce from this statement that n<10, and 10C + 1000>4000 or 10C > 3000 or C > 300. However, we do not know for sure how much C is. Hence insufficient
Statement I and II:
From the two statements we know the following
C>300
n<10
and that after selling x-3 copies her income would be y-100
I think I would go with E
Join the discussion