BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

ds - factor2 difficult

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:44 pm
Location: Canada
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:530

ds - factor2 difficult

by ccassel » Tue Apr 05, 2011 6:17 pm
Hi,

How would you explain the answer to this question?

If n and t are positive integers, is n a factor of t?

(1) n=3^n-2
(2) t=3^n

Cheers,
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 243
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:12 am
Location: Dominican Republic
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:480

by MAAJ » Tue Apr 05, 2011 6:38 pm
If n and t are positive integers, is n a factor of t?
t -> n...?

(1) n=3^(n-2)
n = 3^n * 3^(-2)
n = 3^n * 1/9
n = (3^n)/9
Try values and get n = 3
We don't know what "t" is so this is not sufficient

(2) t=3^n
If n=3, then t=27 and 3 is a factor of t
If n=2, then t=9 and 2 is NOT a factor of t
Insufficient

Combining (1) and (2)
n= 3 AND t=3^n
t= 3^3 = 27, THUS n is a factor of t
Sufficient

IMO [spoiler]Correct Answer (C)[/spoiler]
ccassel wrote:Hi,

How would you explain the answer to this question?

If n and t are positive integers, is n a factor of t?

(1) n=3^n-2
(2) t=3^n

Cheers,
"There's a difference between interest and commitment. When you're interested in doing something, you do it only when circumstance permit. When you're committed to something, you accept no excuses, only results."

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3835
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Milpitas, CA
Thanked: 1854 times
Followed by:523 members
GMAT Score:770

by Anurag@Gurome » Tue Apr 05, 2011 9:33 pm
ccassel wrote:Hi,

How would you explain the answer to this question?

If n and t are positive integers, is n a factor of t?

(1) n=3^n-2
(2) t=3^n

Cheers,
(1)n=3^(n-2) has no relation with the variable 't'. So, definitely, (1) alone is NOT SUFFICIENT.

(2)t=3^n
If n = 1, then t = 3; here n is a factor of t, as 3 = 3 * 1.
If n = 2, then t = 9; here n is not a factor of t, as 9 = 3 * 3.
No unique answer.
So, (2) alone is NOT SUFFICIENT.

Combining (1) and (2), n = 3^(n-2)= 3^n * 3^(-2) = 3^n/3^2 = 3^n/9
So, 9n = 3^n, which is equal to t (using statement 2). So, 9n = t.
Hence, clearly n is a factor of t.

The correct answer is C.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 6:33 pm

by Mike G » Thu Apr 07, 2011 7:26 am
Hi Anurag,
can you please explain why you consider n=3^n-2 equivalent to n=3^(n-2)?

I understand n=3^n-2 (original statement) means that n equals (3 to the power of N) MINUS 2. In this case the only possible value for N is 1 ( 1=3^1-2). Every number has 1 as a factor, so the first statement is sufficient to answer the question. Answer A.

If n=3^(n-2) then I completely agree with your line of thought, however n=3^(n-2) is not what's given in the original question ccassel posted.

Mike

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:44 pm
Location: Canada
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:530

by ccassel » Thu Apr 07, 2011 7:52 am
Mike G,

Statement 1 refers to n=3(power of n-2). Brackets would have eliminated this confusion.

Regards,

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3835
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Milpitas, CA
Thanked: 1854 times
Followed by:523 members
GMAT Score:770

by Anurag@Gurome » Thu Apr 07, 2011 5:27 pm
Mike G wrote:Hi Anurag,
can you please explain why you consider n=3^n-2 equivalent to n=3^(n-2)?

I understand n=3^n-2 (original statement) means that n equals (3 to the power of N) MINUS 2. In this case the only possible value for N is 1 ( 1=3^1-2). Every number has 1 as a factor, so the first statement is sufficient to answer the question. Answer A.

If n=3^(n-2) then I completely agree with your line of thought, however n=3^(n-2) is not what's given in the original question ccassel posted.

Mike
I understand that parentheses would have eliminated the confusion. I considered it as n=3^(n-2) as there was no spacing before and after the minus sign in the given expression, n=3^n-2, else it would have been written as n=3^n - 2
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/