BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS-6

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by StarDust845 » Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:08 am
Join the discussion

by desihokie » Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:02 pm
E is correct, pls explain how?
Join the discussion

by StarDust845 » Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:18 pm
I just took few numbers for x and y and I arrived at E.
Join the discussion

by sankruth » Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:51 am
Can someone please tell me what is my mistake... Im sure Im ignoring some fundamental number property!

(x-y)/(x+y) > 1?

(x-y) > (x+y)

0 > 2y OR y < 0 which is St 2, hence B

However when I substitute values for x and y I get E.
Join the discussion

by simplyjat » Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:40 am
(x-y)/(x+y) > 1?

(x-y) > (x+y)
You can not multiply both sides of inequality if you don't know the sign of the number multiplied.

3 > 2 but if we multiply both sides with -2; -6 <4> 1 => (x-y) > (x+y) only if (x+y) > 0
simplyjat
Join the discussion

by sankruth » Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:52 am
Ah! Thank you very much!
Join the discussion

by desihokie » Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:04 pm
is there any other method other than picking numbers for solving this? anybody wants to try? stuart, u wanna take a shot at this? TIA
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:27 pm
Sure, I'll give it a whirl (although not all DS questions can be answered without picking #s).

Q: Is (x-y)/(x+y) > 1?

To get a "yes" answer, we need 2 things to happen:

First, the top and bottom have to both be + or both be -.

Second, the abs value of (x-y) has to be greater than the abs value of (x+y) (otherwise we'll have a fraction and it won't be > 1).

So, we need to know about the signs and relative values of x and y.

(1) x > 0

Doesn't mention y, but it still could be enough, we need to be careful.

If y is negative, then the top will be bigger than the bottom and we can get a "yes" by picking a y with smaller magnitude than x. However, we can also get a "no" by picking a y with greater magnitude than x (because we'll get a +/- which will be < 0).

Insufficient.

(2) y < 0

We've already done the work to show that negative y could lead to either a yes or a no (see above).

Insufficient.

Since we already considered y being negative along with statement 1, and got both a yes and a no, joining the statements together does us no good either.

(E) is correct.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion