BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

relation between x>y>z

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: relation between x>y>z

by Morgoth » Fri Sep 26, 2008 9:05 am
ifthyder wrote:how do we know about y ?
x>y>z ?

1) xz>yz, since x y and z are positive numbers we can simplify this
x>y. we dont know anything about z. Insufficient.

2) yx>yz, since x y and z are positive numbers we can simplify this
x>z, we dont know anything about y. Insufficient.

Combining 1 & 2

We still dont know about the relationship between z and y. Insufficient.

Thus, E is the answer.
Join the discussion

by kuroneko1313 » Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:46 am
I think it's E too, agree with Morgoth's explanation.
Join the discussion

by sumithshah » Tue Sep 30, 2008 10:02 am
Subtract 1 from 2, you shall get

xz-yx>0

x(z-y)>0

therefore, either both x and z-y>0 or x and z-y <0
but we know X>0 ( x is given as positive) hence z-y>0, z>y.

Hence C
Join the discussion

by EricLien9122 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:54 am
sumithshah:

I don't think you can subtract inequality equations.



Please share your thoughts.
Join the discussion

by gabriel » Tue Sep 30, 2008 1:40 pm
EricLien9122 wrote:sumithshah:

I don't think you can subtract inequality equations.



Please share your thoughts.
You can subtract inequality equations. But there are some operations like multiplication, division and squaring that you can do only after considering the sign of the variables in question.

Cheers.
Join the discussion

by schumi_gmat » Tue Sep 30, 2008 1:42 pm
what is the OA
Join the discussion

by kris610 » Wed Oct 01, 2008 11:58 am
sumithshah wrote:Subtract 1 from 2, you shall get

xz-yx>0

x(z-y)>0

therefore, either both x and z-y>0 or x and z-y <0
but we know X>0 ( x is given as positive) hence z-y>0, z>y.

Hence C
I can subract the other way around, in which case I would get y>z.

I think it is E.
Join the discussion