chipbmk wrote:Stuart, If I rephrase the above to: Does X^2+Y^2 = 85?
Then take all I did for Statement 2 and plug in to figure out if it does equal 85 and you get a definitive yes, dont you?
Statement (2) says:
x = y + 1
If we substitute it in as you did, we get:
DOES (y+1)^2+Y^2=85?
--> DOES Y^2+2Y+1+Y^2=85?
--> DOES 2Y^2+2Y-84=0?
--> DOES Y^2+Y-42=0?
--> DOES (Y-6)(Y+7)=0?
--> DOES Y= 6 or -7?
Well, here's the problem - we have no clue what the value of y is, so there's no way to answer the question definitively.
Again, the mistake you made (and it's a very common mistake in DS) was to treat the question as though it were a statement of fact rather than just a question.
Let's illustrate with a much simpler example:
Q: Does x = y?
(1) y = 4
If we sub in y=4 to the original, we get:
x = 4
Now if we plug back in y=4, we get 4=4, which is true! That's a definite yes!
Whooooaaaa... of course it's true, since we assumed that x=y to find the value of x. However, if we think about the statement and the question, there's no way that knowing that y=4 is sufficient to know whether x=y, since we have absolutely no information about x at all. If we treat the original as a question instead, we simply end up with a new question:
Does x = 4?
and since we have no info at all about x, (1) is insufficient to answer that question.
Basically, if part of your scratchwork involves assuming that the original question is a statement of fact, you'll always end up proving that it's true.