BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

divisibility question!

Expert replies
by chaitanya.bhansali » Tue Jul 15, 2014 12:55 pm
i don't want to solve this question (or similar questions) by picking numbers, how would i solve this?

Is x divisible by 12?

1) x is divisible by 27.
2) x is divisible by 6.

Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by [email protected] » Tue Jul 15, 2014 5:30 pm
Hi chaitanya.bhansali,

If you don't want to use strategic approaches on the GMAT, then you're likely going to run into pacing problems and a limit to how high you can score. That having been said, you can approach this DS question mathematically, using prime factorization.

The question asks "Is X divisible by 12?"; this essentially asks..."when you prime factor X, do you have AT LEAST a 3 and two 2s?" This is a YES/NO question.

Fact 1: X is divisible by 27.

By prime factoring 27, we find that X contains AT LEAST three 3s (3x3x3 = 27), but we don't know anything else about X.

IF X also contains two (or more) 2s, then the answer to the question is YES.
IF X does NOT contain two (or more) 2s, then the answer to the question is NO.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

Fact 2: X is divisible by 6.

By prime factoring 6, we find that S contains AT LEAST one 2 and one 3 (2x3 = 6), but we don't know anything else about X.

IF X contains another 2, then the answer to the question is YES.
IF X does NOT contain another 2, then the answer to the question is NO.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combined, we know that X contains one 2 and three 3s (not four 3s...the 3 from Fact 2 is already "counted" in Fact 1), but we don't know anything else about X.

IF X contains another 2, then the answer to the question is YES.
IF X does NOT contain another 2, then the answer to the question is NO.
Combined, INSUFFICIENT.

Final Answer: E

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by GMATinsight » Tue Jul 15, 2014 6:03 pm
chaitanya.bhansali wrote:i don't want to solve this question (or similar questions) by picking numbers, how would i solve this?

Is x divisible by 12?

1) x is divisible by 27.
2) x is divisible by 6.

Thanks.
Question : Is x divisible by 12?
The answer has to be in YES or NO

but for x to be divisible by 12, it should be divisible by 3 as well as 4 [Because 12 = 3 x 4]

Rephrased Question : Is x Divisible by 3 as well as 4?

Statement 1)x is divisible by 27
This only communicates that x is divisible by 3 [3 being the factor of 27]
but we are clueless whether x is divisible by 4 or not therefore No concrete answer to the question in form of YES or NO
INSUFFICIENT

Statement 2)x is divisible by 6
This only communicates that x is divisible by 3 as well as by 2 [6 = 2x3, 2 and 3 being the factor of 27]
but we are clueless whether x is divisible by 4 or not [because 4 requires 2 power of 2 but here we have just one power of 2 for sure] therefore No concrete answer to the question in form of YES or NO
INSUFFICIENT

Combining the two statements

We understand that x is divisible 3 and 2 but we can not be sure whether x is divisible by 4 therefore Insufficient

Answer: Option E
"GMATinsight"Bhoopendra Singh & Sushma Jha
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Jul 15, 2014 6:33 pm
chaitanya.bhansali wrote:
Is x divisible by 12?

1) x is divisible by 27.
2) x is divisible by 6.
A lot of integer property questions can be solved using prime factorization.
For questions involving divisibility, divisors, factors and multiples, we can say:
If N is divisible by k, then k is "hiding" within the prime factorization of N

Consider these examples:
24 is divisible by 3 because 24 = (2)(2)(2)(3)
Likewise, 70 is divisible by 5 because 70 = (2)(5)(7)
And 112 is divisible by 8 because 112 = (2)(2)(2)(2)(7)
And 630 is divisible by 15 because 630 = (2)(3)(3)(5)(7)

Now onto the question.....

Target question: Is x divisible by 12?
Since 12 = (2)(2)(3), we can REPHRASE the target question as....

REPHRASED target question: Are there two 2's and one 3 hiding within the prime factorization of x?

Statement 1: x is divisible by 27
27 = (3)(3)(3), so we know that there are three 3's hiding within the prime factorization of x. So, we have the one 3 taken care of but can we be also certain that there are two 2's hiding within the prime factorization of x? NO
So, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 1: x is divisible by 6
6 = (2)(3), so we know that there is one 2 and one 3 hiding within the prime factorization of x. So, we have the one 3 taken care of but can we be also certain that there are two 2's hiding within the prime factorization of x? NO
So, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT


Statements 1 and 2 combined
Statement 1 tells us that there are three 3's hiding within the prime factorization of x
Statement 2 tells us that there is one 2 and one 3 hiding within the prime factorization of x
Combined, we can be certain that there are three 3's AND one 2 hiding within the prime factorization of x.
So, we still have NOT guaranteed that there is one 3 AND two 2's hiding within the prime factorization of x.
Since we cannot be certain that answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer = E

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by chaitanya.bhansali » Wed Jul 16, 2014 8:52 am
Thanks everyone for your prompt replies, really appreciate it!
Join the discussion


by Matt@VeritasPrep » Wed Jul 16, 2014 11:29 am
chaitanya.bhansali wrote:i don't want to solve this question (or similar questions) by picking numbers, how would i solve this?

Is x divisible by 12?

1) x is divisible by 27.
2) x is divisible by 6.

Thanks.
I think you're right to avoid picking numbers on divisibility questions: these questions are so common that you need to understand them, and once you understand them you can answer them much more quickly if get the concepts.

For instance, if x is divisible by 12, we can interpret that statement in one of two ways, whichever you prefer:

1:: x is a multiple of 12
2:: x has a 3 and two 2s in its prime factorization (since 12 = 3 * 2 * 2).

So our question is really "Is x a multiple of 12?" or "Does x has a 3 and two 2s in its prime factorization?"

S1 tells us that x is a multiple of 27. Some multiples of 27 (such as 27*4) are also multiples of 12; some others (such as 27*2) are NOT multiples of 12. So S1 is INSUFFICIENT. The conceptual key here is that S1 tells us that x divides by 3 (because 27 divides by 3), but NOT whether x divides by 4. Since 12 = 3*4, we can't answer the question.

S2 tells us that x is a multiple of 6. Some multiples of 6 (such as 6*2) are multiples of 12; some aren't, such as 6*3. Conceptually, this tells us that x divides by 6, or by 3*2, but not that x divides by 3*2*2, or 12.

S1+S2 together tells us that x is a multiple of 27 and a multiple of 6. Some multiples of 6 and 27, such as 6*27, are NOT divisible by 12; some others, such as 6*27*2, ARE divisible by 12. STILL insufficient! Conceptually, we know this will be insufficient because we still don't have to have 2*2 in any of our multiples, and to divide by 12 we need to divide by 2*2.
Join the discussion