Industrialists from the country Distopia were accused of promoting the Distopian intervention in the Arcadian civil war merely to insure that the industrialists’ facilities in Arcadia made substantial profits during the war. Yet this cannot be the motive since, as the Distopians foresaw, Distopia’s federal expenses for the intervention were eight billion dollars, whereas, during the war, profits from the Distopian industrialists’ facilities in Arcadia totaled only four billion dollars.
Which of the following, if true, exposes a serious flaw in the argument made in the second sentence above?
(A) During the Arcadian war, many Distopian industrialists with facilities located in Arcadia experienced a significant rise in productivity in their facilities located in Distopia.
(B) The largest proportion of Distopia’s federal expenses is borne by those who receive no significant industrial profits.
(C) Most Distopian industrialists’ facilities located in Arcadia are expected to maintain the level of profits they achieved during the war.
(D) Distopian industrialists’ facilities in Arcadia made substantial profits before the events that triggered the civil war.
(E) Many Distopians expressed concern over the suffering that Arcadians underwent during the civil war.
Distopian industrialist
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:48 am
- Thanked: 15 times
IMO Breachac wrote:Industrialists from the country Distopia were accused of promoting the Distopian intervention in the Arcadian civil war merely to insure that the industrialists’ facilities in Arcadia made substantial profits during the war. Yet this cannot be the motive since, as the Distopians foresaw, Distopia’s federal expenses for the intervention were eight billion dollars, whereas, during the war, profits from the Distopian industrialists’ facilities in Arcadia totaled only four billion dollars.
Which of the following, if true, exposes a serious flaw in the argument made in the second sentence above?
(A) During the Arcadian war, many Distopian industrialists with facilities located in Arcadia experienced a significant rise in productivity in their facilities located in Distopia.
(B) The largest proportion of Distopia’s federal expenses is borne by those who receive no significant industrial profits.
(C) Most Distopian industrialists’ facilities located in Arcadia are expected to maintain the level of profits they achieved during the war.
(D) Distopian industrialists’ facilities in Arcadia made substantial profits before the events that triggered the civil war.
(E) Many Distopians expressed concern over the suffering that Arcadians underwent during the civil war.
If the fedral expenses were not borne by Industrialists, they'll be least bothered for the difference in expense and profit..... So obvioulsly profit was the motive .....
Guys do you see a similarity between this question and a real life war happened few time back, involving a world superpower and a country in middle east Asia. .. or its just me ...
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:44 am
- Thanked: 26 times
B for me too.
The industrialists raked in 4 billion dollar profit by contributing very limited amount of the total 8 billion dollars or some one else is contributing more than 4 billion dollars. They have an incentive and that exposes the flaw.
The industrialists raked in 4 billion dollar profit by contributing very limited amount of the total 8 billion dollars or some one else is contributing more than 4 billion dollars. They have an incentive and that exposes the flaw.
Please do not post answer along with the Question you post/ask
Let people discuss the Questions with out seeing answers.
Let people discuss the Questions with out seeing answers.
i say B as well.
the stimulus here is implying that industrialists could not have promoted war for money making motives because profits went down during the war. The assumption is that industrialists suffered as a result of the war as indicated by the decreasing profits.
The question here is asks about the weakness. So I would look for something that destroys the assumption. Basically that something else caused profits to sink and that industrialists weren't affected.
A cannot be the answer because its out of scope. There is no mention of profits. Increase productivity does not necessarily mean increased profits. Sometimes businesses that increase productivity have increased costs...so don't fall into that trap!
the stimulus here is implying that industrialists could not have promoted war for money making motives because profits went down during the war. The assumption is that industrialists suffered as a result of the war as indicated by the decreasing profits.
The question here is asks about the weakness. So I would look for something that destroys the assumption. Basically that something else caused profits to sink and that industrialists weren't affected.
A cannot be the answer because its out of scope. There is no mention of profits. Increase productivity does not necessarily mean increased profits. Sometimes businesses that increase productivity have increased costs...so don't fall into that trap!
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 8:33 pm
but the question asks for "flaw in the argument made in the SECOND sentence above". doesnt the second sentence argue profit was NOT the motive? If so, how can B be the answer?
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:51 pm
- Thanked: 12 times
It will be B
first is was thinking of A as increase in productivity is Misleading
But increase in productivity doesn't mean increase in profit.
Thus Only B is the answer ..
first is was thinking of A as increase in productivity is Misleading
But increase in productivity doesn't mean increase in profit.
Thus Only B is the answer ..
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:18 am
- Thanked: 5 times
- GMAT Score:610
Second statement lends support to the fact taht "profit was the motive"beatgmat30 wrote:but the question asks for "flaw in the argument made in the SECOND sentence above". doesnt the second sentence argue profit was NOT the motive? If so, how can B be the answer?
How?
Pls note : we are talking aboutthe profit of the industrialist in Distopian
If B is true then the following scenario would happen
Before the War:Industrialist invested pretty less as significant investment came from others
After the War: they made huge profits 4 M$ (really huge )
So the difference would be something huge
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 12:04 am
- Thanked: 3 times
- GMAT Score:620
I'm stilllllllllll not able to dIgest that the answer is B:x
It sounds like " industrialists who bore a lesser proportion of federal intervention cost are largely benefitted than industrialists who bore a significant proportion of the federal intervention cost "
It sounds like " industrialists who bore a lesser proportion of federal intervention cost are largely benefitted than industrialists who bore a significant proportion of the federal intervention cost "