BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Distances

Expert replies
by gmat009 » Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:02 am
OA is C but IMO B is sufficient.
From B I am getting r+s=0
r=-s, so B is sufficient.
Why answer is C. Can someone plz. explain why do we need A
Attachments
Doc15.doc
(48.5 KiB) Downloaded 135 times
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: Distances

by logitech » Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:23 am
gmat009 wrote:OA is C but IMO B is sufficient.
From B I am getting r+s=0
r=-s, so B is sufficient.
Why answer is C. Can someone plz. explain why do we need A
Gmat009,

Lets do this exercise:

Solve this question for

S=0

and

S<0

let's see what you get. Feel free to use numbers.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

Re: Distances

by gmat009 » Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:49 am
logitech wrote:
gmat009 wrote:OA is C but IMO B is sufficient.
From B I am getting r+s=0
r=-s, so B is sufficient.
Why answer is C. Can someone plz. explain why do we need A
Gmat009,

Lets do this exercise:

Solve this question for

S=0

and

S<0

let's see what you get. Feel free to use numbers.
We cannot take s=0.
In option B he says that "Distance between t and -s".
If s is 0 the 2nd equation cannot say -s becoz 0 is neither positive nor negative.
Let me know if I am thinking wrong or missing something
Join the discussion

Re: Distances

by logitech » Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:56 am
gmat009 wrote:
Let me know if I am thinking wrong or missing something
You are good. Try the next one:

S<0
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

Re: Distances

by gmat009 » Wed Nov 12, 2008 10:45 am
logitech wrote:
gmat009 wrote:
Let me know if I am thinking wrong or missing something
You are good. Try the next one:

S<0
If s<0 , then r=-(-s)
r=s and s=-s
Therefore this is sufficient becoz if s=-3, then r=3, if s=-4, then r=4
So r and s have opposite signs and 0 is halfway between r and s

Now take s>0
This is also sufficient becoz if s=3, then r=-3, if s=4, then r=-4
So r and s have opposite signs and 0 is halfway between r and s

Regardless s is positive or negative, r is opposite to s and 0 lies in midway
Join the discussion

Re: Distances

by logitech » Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:33 pm
gmat009 wrote:
logitech wrote:
gmat009 wrote:
Let me know if I am thinking wrong or missing something
You are good. Try the next one:

S<0
If s<0 , then r=-(-s)
r=s and s=-s
Therefore this is sufficient becoz if s=-3, then r=3, if s=-4, then r=4
So r and s have opposite signs and 0 is halfway between r and s

Now take s>0
This is also sufficient becoz if s=3, then r=-3, if s=4, then r=-4
So r and s have opposite signs and 0 is halfway between r and s

Regardless s is positive or negative, r is opposite to s and 0 lies in midway


R----------S---------T-------------O---------------- -S

-S.................0-------R--------S----------T


-S------R----0----------S------------T

R----------S---------0---------------t--------S

R----------S---------0---------S-------t-

Think again:

TR is equal to T-S ?
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion