Susan drove an average speed of 30 miles per hour for the first 50 miles of a trip & then at a average speed of 60 miles/hr for the remaining 30 miles of the trip if she made no stops during the trip what was susan's avg speed in miles/hr for the entire trip.
Guys, I know how to solve this problem in the traditional way so please I am not looking for the solution as much as the thought process.
We know that for the first 50 miles she drove 30m/h
For the remaining 30 miles she drove at 60 m/h
We are asked for the average speed (m/h). Which is Total Distance/Total Time. Easy to calculate.
But note that in this weighted average problem we are weighting the speeds by time.
(t1*X+t2*Y)/(t1+t2)=Total Distance/Total Time.
But notice the weights t1/(t1+t2)& t1/(t1+t2) are just scalars! It simply a percentage/ratio of t1 to total. IF that is the case why can't I scale the 30m/h and the 60m/h by the distances for each respective portions? So w1=d1/(d1+d2)=50/80 and w2=d2/(d1+d2)=30/80 and multiply the weights by their respective speeds? What does doing so get me?
Guys, I know how to solve this problem in the traditional way so please I am not looking for the solution as much as the thought process.
We know that for the first 50 miles she drove 30m/h
For the remaining 30 miles she drove at 60 m/h
We are asked for the average speed (m/h). Which is Total Distance/Total Time. Easy to calculate.
But note that in this weighted average problem we are weighting the speeds by time.
(t1*X+t2*Y)/(t1+t2)=Total Distance/Total Time.
But notice the weights t1/(t1+t2)& t1/(t1+t2) are just scalars! It simply a percentage/ratio of t1 to total. IF that is the case why can't I scale the 30m/h and the 60m/h by the distances for each respective portions? So w1=d1/(d1+d2)=50/80 and w2=d2/(d1+d2)=30/80 and multiply the weights by their respective speeds? What does doing so get me?


















