BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Distance from origin

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Anurag@Gurome » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:48 pm
apex231 wrote:In the rectangular coordinate system, are the points (a, b) and (c, d) equidistant from the origin?
(1) a/b = c/d
(2) sqrt((a)^2) + sqrt((b)^2) = sqrt((c)^2) + sqrt((d)^2)
Distance of (a, b) from origin = √(a² + b²)
Distance of (c, d) from origin = √(c² + d²)
They will be equidistant from the origin when these two quantities will be equal.

Statement 1: (a/b) = (c/d)
Implies, ad = bc
This is not enough to conclude whether (a, b) and (c, d) are equidistant from origin or not.

Not sufficient.

Statement 2: √(a²) + √(b²) = √(c²) + √(d²)
Implies, |a| + |b| = |c| + |d|
This is not enough to conclude whether (a, b) and (c, d) are equidistant from origin or not.

Not sufficient.

1 & 2 Together: Multiply the equation obtained from statement 2 by |d|.
=> |a||d| + |b||d| = |c||d| + |d||d|

Now from statement 1, ad = bc => |a||d| = |b||c|. Replace |b||c| instead of |a||d| in the above equation.
=> |b||c| + |b||d| = |c||d| + |d||d|
=> |b|*(|c| + |d|) = |d|*(|c| + |d|)
=> (|b| - |d|)(|c| + |d|) = 0

Note that for the ratio of statement 1 to be defined, b and d cannot be equal to zero. Hence (|c| + |d|) cannot be equal to zero. Which implies (|b| - |d|) = 0.

Therefore, |b| = |d|
This again implies |a| = |c| as |a||d| = |b||c|

This means the absolute values of the coordinates of the points are same. Which implies they are equidistant from the origin. This is because while determining the distance from origin we are squaring the coordinates and thus the sign doesn't matter.

Sufficient

The correct answer is C.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by shubhamkumar » Mon Apr 09, 2012 12:41 pm
Anurag@Gurome wrote:
apex231 wrote: 1 & 2 Together: Multiply the equation obtained from statement 2 by |d|.
=> |a||d| + |b||d| = |c||d| + |d||d|

Now from statement 1, ad = bc => |a||d| = |b||c|. Replace |b||c| instead of |a||d| in the above equation.
=> |b||c| + |b||d| = |c||d| + |d||d|
=> |b|*(|c| + |d|) = |d|*(|c| + |d|)
=> (|b| - |d|)(|c| + |d|) = 0

Note that for the ratio of statement 1 to be defined, b and d cannot be equal to zero. Hence (|c| + |d|) cannot be equal to zero. Which implies (|b| - |d|) = 0.

Therefore, |b| = |d|
This again implies |a| = |c| as |a||d| = |b||c|

This means the absolute values of the coordinates of the points are same. Which implies they are equidistant from the origin. This is because while determining the distance from origin we are squaring the coordinates and thus the sign doesn't matter.

Sufficient

The correct answer is C.
:arrow:I like Mgmat 's approach. since |a|+|b|=|c|+|d|,a/b=c/d implies that the ratio of a to b is equal to the ratio of c to d, therefore |a|=|c| and |b|=|d|..could save a few seconds on actual day....
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:38 am
apex231 wrote:In the rectangular coordinate system, are the points (a, b) and (c, d) equidistant from the origin?
(1) a/b = c/d
(2) √(a²) + √(b²) = √(c²) + √(d²)
Statement 1: a/b = c/d
If the equation is 1/2 = 1/2, then (1,2) and (1,2) are equidistant from the origin.
If the equation is 1/2 = 2/4, then (1,2) and (2,4) are not equidistant from the origin.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: √(a²) + √(b²) = √(c²) + √(d²)
√x² = |x|.
Rephrasing the statement, we get:
|a| + |b| = |c| + |d|.
If the equation is |0| + |2| = |0| + |2|, then (0,2) and (0,2) are equidistant from the origin.
If the equation is |0| + |2| = |1| + |1|, then (0,2) and (1,1) are not equidistant from the origin.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statements 1 and 2 combined:

Let a/b = c/d = k.
Then a=kb and c=kd.
Substituting a=kb and c=kd into |a|+|b| = |c|+|d|, we get:
|kb|+|b| = |kd|+|d|
(k+1)|b| = (k+1)|d|
|b| = |d|, implying that |a| = |c|.
Since the x values in (a,b) and (c,d) are equidistant from the origin, and the y values in (a,b) and (c,d) are equidistant from the origin, the two points are equidistant from the origin.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.

One take-away:
To evaluate each statement ON ITS OWN, I plugged in values.
To evaluate the two statements COMBINED, I applied algebra.
Many DS problems are best solved with this approach.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion