BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Difficult Math Question #50 - Standard Deviation

Expert replies
by 800guy » Wed Nov 08, 2006 3:54 pm
A set of data consists of the following 5 numbers: 0,2,4,6, and 8. Which two numbers, if added to create a set of 7 numbers, will result in a new standard deviation that is close to the standard deviation for the original 5 numbers?

A). -1 and 9
B). 4 and 4
C). 3 and 5
D). 2 and 6
E). 0 and 8
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

answer

by gamemaster » Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:22 am
the average of the series is 4
the standard deviation is: sqrt [(40)/5] = sqrt [8]

we would like the new sum to be ~56 to get sqrt[8] so the closest will be:

2 and 6 then the standard deviation would be: sqrt[48/7]

D
Join the discussion

by rajs.kumar » Mon Nov 13, 2006 10:43 am
game I get a different answer. This is what I did.

Answer is C.

SD = srqt( sum(xi - x)^2/n)

SD = standard deviation
(xi - x)^2 = square of the difference between sample and the mean
n = number of samples in the population

the denominator n increases from 5 to 7. This means the new sum(xi - x)^2 should increase by a factor 7/5 = 1.4 to get the same value for the SD.

-1 and 9 the sum increases by 50 (no)
4 and 4 the sum remains the same (no)
3 and 5 the sum increases by 2 (yes)
2 and 6 the sum increases by 8 (no)
0 and 8 the sum increases by 32 (no)
Join the discussion

.

by gamemaster » Mon Nov 13, 2006 11:12 am
well in case its 3 and 5, the standard deviation would be

sqrt[42/7] = sqrt[6]

in case its 2 and 6 it will be:

sqrt[48/7] which is bigger than sqrt[6] but smaller than sqrt[8] so closer to sqrt[8] than sqrt[6] is

so i still think its 2 and 6
Join the discussion

OA

by 800guy » Mon Nov 13, 2006 4:57 pm
OA:

SD = Sqrt(Sum(X-x)^2/N)
Since N is changing from 5 to 7. Value of Sum(X-x)^2 should change from 40(current) to 48. So that SD remains same.

so due to new numbers it adds 8. Choice D only fits here.
Join the discussion

by deya1107 » Sun Oct 20, 2013 11:54 pm
The answer would be (E) 0 and 8. The standard deviation of the original series is ~3.16. I have calculated each option and tally with the original one. The standard deviation of the series including 0 and 8 is ~3.464 which is the closest among all.

There is another option (B) 4 and 4. Here the standard deviation are not changing. So, it is moot whether (B) or (E).
Join the discussion

by sahilchaudhary » Mon Oct 21, 2013 12:51 am
The original S.D. is sqrt(8) = 2.8.
So, I think the two closest options to this are 2 & 6.
So, D.
Sahil Chaudhary
If you find this post helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
https://www.sahilchaudhary007.blocked
Join the discussion

by rakeshd347 » Mon Oct 21, 2013 1:17 am
800guy wrote:A set of data consists of the following 5 numbers: 0,2,4,6, and 8. Which two numbers, if added to create a set of 7 numbers, will result in a new standard deviation that is close to the standard deviation for the original 5 numbers?

A). -1 and 9
B). 4 and 4
C). 3 and 5
D). 2 and 6
E). 0 and 8
Answer to this question should be A. Why

Standard deviation tells you how wide spread numbers are from the mean. If you add 0 or 8 it won't change anything because they are already in the set. If you add 4,4 it will reduce the SD because we will have 3 4's in the set. Same is C and D. 3 &5 and a2&6 are already in the set so adding them won't make any difference but if you widen the range or add new numbers outside the range then it will change the SD.

One more thing you don't need to calculate SD here. Gmat will never give you question in which you have to calculate SD.

Thanks,
Rakesh
Join the discussion

by theCodeToGMAT » Mon Oct 21, 2013 1:31 am
Rakesh, SD varies with Mean i.e. the farther the numbers from mean.. greater will be SD.

So, {A} & {E} are surely out

I am stuck between {B}, {C} & {D}.

I know we can solve and find, but GMAC doesn't want us to do so.

However, if the question had been "which of the combination will result in lowest SD" then it answer would have been {B} 4,4
R A H U L
Join the discussion

by rakeshd347 » Mon Oct 21, 2013 1:59 am
theCodeToGMAT wrote:Rakesh, SD varies with Mean i.e. the farther the numbers from mean.. greater will be SD.

So, {A} & {E} are surely out

I am stuck between {B}, {C} & {D}.

I know we can solve and find, but GMAC doesn't want us to do so.

However, if the question had been "which of the combination will result in lowest SD" then it answer would have been {B} 4,4
Hi Rahul,

Your reasoning is wrong. Let me elaborate it here.
If you add -1,9 to the set the mean will still be 4 ( the mean for the current set is 4). however 9 will be farther from 4 than all other number and hence SD will rise. So answer is 100% A.
If you add 4,4...then SD will reduce as 4 is already in the set and mean won't change it will be 4 itself so 3 numbers are on the mean.
If you add 3 and 5....then SD will not reduce rather than increase because 3 and 5 are within the number set given.
same is with 2&6 and 0&8.

So final answer is definitely
[/spoiler]A[spoiler]. I don't know why you crossed out A. It is indeed the OA.[/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by rakeshd347 » Mon Oct 21, 2013 2:03 am
theCodeToGMAT wrote:Rakesh, SD varies with Mean i.e. the farther the numbers from mean.. greater will be SD.

So, {A} & {E} are surely out

I am stuck between {B}, {C} & {D}.

I know we can solve and find, but GMAC doesn't want us to do so.

However, if the question had been "which of the combination will result in lowest SD" then it answer would have been {B} 4,4
To even give better understanding if you would have add -2 and 10 then this new set will have even higher SD than adding -1,9. Why? because 10 is farthest from mean 4 and if we remove 10 then numbers will come closer and SD will reduce.

I hope this makes sense let me know if you still have confusion.
Join the discussion

by rakeshd347 » Mon Oct 21, 2013 2:06 am
theCodeToGMAT wrote:Rakesh, SD varies with Mean i.e. the farther the numbers from mean.. greater will be SD.

So, {A} & {E} are surely out

I am stuck between {B}, {C} & {D}.

I know we can solve and find, but GMAC doesn't want us to do so.

However, if the question had been "which of the combination will result in lowest SD" then it answer would have been {B} 4,4
ZEEEEE....i have been calculating set which will have higher than the current set. Not close to the current one.
Join the discussion

by theCodeToGMAT » Mon Oct 21, 2013 2:13 am
Rakesh, I think you must misunderstood the question. The question says:

"will result in a new standard deviation that is close to the standard deviation for the original 5 numbers"

This means that closest difference between Original & New Set

Aside, just to be concrete on my answer:

ORIGINAL SET: SD = 3.16
A). -1 and 9 => SD = 3.87 ==> Difference = 0.71
B). 4 and 4 => SD = 2.58 ==> Difference = 0.56 # Lowest SD; I hope my point is clear now :)
C). 3 and 5 => SD = 2.64 ==> Difference = 0.50
D). 2 and 6 => SD = 2.828 ==> Difference = 0.332
E). 0 and 8 => SD = 3.464 ==> Difference = 0.324

As I said, GMAC doesn't want us to do so much calculation.. So, i doubt on this question
R A H U L
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Oct 21, 2013 6:46 am
theCodeToGMAT wrote:Rakesh, I think you must misunderstood the question. The question says:

"will result in a new standard deviation that is close to the standard deviation for the original 5 numbers"

This means that closest difference between Original & New Set

Aside, just to be concrete on my answer:

ORIGINAL SET: SD = 3.16
A). -1 and 9 => SD = 3.87 ==> Difference = 0.71
B). 4 and 4 => SD = 2.58 ==> Difference = 0.56 # Lowest SD; I hope my point is clear now :)
C). 3 and 5 => SD = 2.64 ==> Difference = 0.50
D). 2 and 6 => SD = 2.828 ==> Difference = 0.332
E). 0 and 8 => SD = 3.464 ==> Difference = 0.324

As I said, GMAC doesn't want us to do so much calculation.. So, i doubt on this question
Be careful, theCodeToGMAT. You have use the formula for the sample standard deviation, and you need to use the formula for the population standard deviation.

For more see: https://www.mathsisfun.com/data/standard ... mulas.html

You can plug in values here to get population SDs: https://easycalculation.com/statistics/s ... iation.php


Having said that, I do agree with you that the question required FAR TOO many calculations to be GMAT-worthy.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by theCodeToGMAT » Mon Oct 21, 2013 6:54 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote: Be careful, theCodeToGMAT. You have use the formula for the sample standard deviation, and you need to use the formula for the population standard deviation.

For more see: https://www.mathsisfun.com/data/standard ... mulas.html

You can plug in values here to get population SDs: https://easycalculation.com/statistics/s ... iation.php


Having said that, I do agree with you that the question required FAR TOO many calculations to be GMAT-worthy.

Cheers,
Brent
Hello Brent, I didn't do the calculations manually .. But yes.. I use the formula on the link you shared :)

The link I used for calculations: https://www.calculator.net/standard-devi ... lator.html

Ok, now i see why there were different types of SDs :) ..

Thanks!
R A H U L
Join the discussion