BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Different CR

Expert replies
by imskpwr » Wed Oct 22, 2014 4:28 am
Preliminary tests show that the drug known as Mephaline is useful in treating people experiencing memory loss due to Alzheimer's disease. These same tests showed that Mephaline did not appear to slow or reverse memory loss in people who experienced memory loss due to a brain injury. There must be something qualitatively different about these two types of memory loss.

Which of the following most strengthens the conclusion in the argument above?

Mephaline works by acting on the medial temporal lobes of the brain.

Patients who took part in the tests had similar amounts of memory loss prior to the tests.

People with Alzheimer's disease usually have impaired powers of speech.

Some of the people tested were unaware that they were given a drug that was intended to reduce memory loss.

The average age of the people tested who had lost memory due to a brain injury was less than the average age of the people with Alzheimer's disease.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:43 am
imskpwr wrote:Preliminary tests show that the drug known as Mephaline is useful in treating people experiencing memory loss due to Alzheimer's disease. These same tests showed that Mephaline did not appear to slow or reverse memory loss in people who experienced memory loss due to a brain injury. There must be something qualitatively different about these two types of memory loss.

Which of the following most strengthens the conclusion in the argument above?

Mephaline works by acting on the medial temporal lobes of the brain.

Patients who took part in the tests had similar amounts of memory loss prior to the tests.

People with Alzheimer's disease usually have impaired powers of speech.

Some of the people tested were unaware that they were given a drug that was intended to reduce memory loss.

The average age of the people tested who had lost memory due to a brain injury was less than the average age of the people with Alzheimer's disease.
The study compares PEOPLE WITH ALZHEIMER'S to PEOPLE WITH A BRAIN INJURY.
The conclusion is that the two groups of people have DIFFERENT TYPES OF MEMORY LOSS.
One assumption: that there was NO OTHER DIFFERENCE between the two groups of people.
One way to strengthen the conclusion is to eliminate a possible difference between the two groups of people.
Answer choice B:
Patients who took part in the tests had similar amounts of memory loss prior to the tests.
By indicating that the people with Alzheimer's and those with a brain injury all had SIMILAR AMOUNTS of memory loss, B strengthens the study's conclusion: Mephaline was effective for the first group but not for the second because the two groups have DIFFERENT TYPES of memory loss.

The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by imskpwr » Mon Nov 10, 2014 7:43 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
imskpwr wrote:Preliminary tests show that the drug known as Mephaline is useful in treating people experiencing memory loss due to Alzheimer's disease. These same tests showed that Mephaline did not appear to slow or reverse memory loss in people who experienced memory loss due to a brain injury. There must be something qualitatively different about these two types of memory loss.

Which of the following most strengthens the conclusion in the argument above?

Mephaline works by acting on the medial temporal lobes of the brain.

Patients who took part in the tests had similar amounts of memory loss prior to the tests.

People with Alzheimer's disease usually have impaired powers of speech.

Some of the people tested were unaware that they were given a drug that was intended to reduce memory loss.

The average age of the people tested who had lost memory due to a brain injury was less than the average age of the people with Alzheimer's disease.
The study compares PEOPLE WITH ALZHEIMER'S to PEOPLE WITH A BRAIN INJURY.
The conclusion is that the two groups of people have DIFFERENT TYPES OF MEMORY LOSS.
One assumption: that there was NO OTHER DIFFERENCE between the two groups of people.
One way to strengthen the conclusion is to eliminate a possible difference between the two groups of people.
Answer choice B:
Patients who took part in the tests had similar amounts of memory loss prior to the tests.
By indicating that the people with Alzheimer's and those with a brain injury all had SIMILAR AMOUNTS of memory loss, B strengthens the study's conclusion: Mephaline was effective for the first group but not for the second because the two groups have DIFFERENT TYPES of memory loss.

The correct answer is B.
Why E is not a contender?

My reasoning:
E shows one difference between the two types of memory loss. That can be considered a QUALITATIVE difference. so E leads to conclusion.

B shows SAME "amount of memory loss" is a QUANTITATIVE Similarity between two. but B will not lead to conclusion.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Nov 12, 2014 4:20 am
imskpwr wrote:Why E is not a contender?

My reasoning:
E shows one difference between the two types of memory loss. That can be considered a QUALITATIVE difference. so E leads to conclusion.
E: The average age of the PEOPLE tested who had lost memory due to a brain injury was less than the average age of the PEOPLE with Alzheimer's disease.
The argument concludes that there must be something qualitatively different about the two types of memory loss.
E offers an ALTERNATE REASON for the results of the study: that the people with a brain injury were YOUNGER than the people with Alzheimer's.
In suggesting an alternate reason for the results of the study, E WEAKENS the conclusion that there must be something qualitatively different about the two types of memory loss.
Eliminate E.
B shows SAME "amount of memory loss" is a QUANTITATIVE Similarity between two. but B will not lead to conclusion.
It is possible that Mephaline proved more effective for people with a brain injury because they suffered LESS memory loss than did people with Alzheimer's.
The OA RULES OUT this possibility.
By ruling out an alternate explanation for the results of the study, the OA STRENGTHENS the conclusion that there must be something qualitatively different about the two types of memory loss.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by sabinadhikari99 » Tue Feb 02, 2016 1:11 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
imskpwr wrote:Preliminary tests show that the drug known as Mephaline is useful in treating people experiencing memory loss due to Alzheimer's disease. These same tests showed that Mephaline did not appear to slow or reverse memory loss in people who experienced memory loss due to a brain injury. There must be something qualitatively different about these two types of memory loss.

Which of the following most strengthens the conclusion in the argument above?

Mephaline works by acting on the medial temporal lobes of the brain.

Patients who took part in the tests had similar amounts of memory loss prior to the tests.

People with Alzheimer's disease usually have impaired powers of speech.

Some of the people tested were unaware that they were given a drug that was intended to reduce memory loss.

The average age of the people tested who had lost memory due to a brain injury was less than the average age of the people with Alzheimer's disease.
The study compares PEOPLE WITH ALZHEIMER'S to PEOPLE WITH A BRAIN INJURY.
The conclusion is that the two groups of people have DIFFERENT TYPES OF MEMORY LOSS.
One assumption: that there was NO OTHER DIFFERENCE between the two groups of people.
One way to strengthen the conclusion is to eliminate a possible difference between the two groups of people.
Answer choice B:
Patients who took part in the tests had similar amounts of memory loss prior to the tests.
By indicating that the people with Alzheimer's and those with a brain injury all had SIMILAR AMOUNTS of memory loss, B strengthens the study's conclusion: Mephaline was effective for the first group but not for the second because the two groups have DIFFERENT TYPES of memory loss.

The correct answer is B.
Join the discussion

by harmeen19 » Sun Oct 09, 2016 10:35 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
imskpwr wrote:Preliminary tests show that the drug known as Mephaline is useful in treating people experiencing memory loss due to Alzheimer's disease. These same tests showed that Mephaline did not appear to slow or reverse memory loss in people who experienced memory loss due to a brain injury. There must be something qualitatively different about these two types of memory loss.

Which of the following most strengthens the conclusion in the argument above?

Mephaline works by acting on the medial temporal lobes of the brain.

Patients who took part in the tests had similar amounts of memory loss prior to the tests.

People with Alzheimer's disease usually have impaired powers of speech.

Some of the people tested were unaware that they were given a drug that was intended to reduce memory loss.

The average age of the people tested who had lost memory due to a brain injury was less than the average age of the people with Alzheimer's disease.
The study compares PEOPLE WITH ALZHEIMER'S to PEOPLE WITH A BRAIN INJURY.
The conclusion is that the two groups of people have DIFFERENT TYPES OF MEMORY LOSS.
One assumption: that there was NO OTHER DIFFERENCE between the two groups of people.
One way to strengthen the conclusion is to eliminate a possible difference between the two groups of people.
Answer choice B:
Patients who took part in the tests had similar amounts of memory loss prior to the tests.
By indicating that the people with Alzheimer's and those with a brain injury all had SIMILAR AMOUNTS of memory loss, B strengthens the study's conclusion: Mephaline was effective for the first group but not for the second because the two groups have DIFFERENT TYPES of memory loss.

The correct answer is B.

Hi Mitch,

We need to strengthen the conclusion where the conclusion is that "the two groups of people have DIFFERENT TYPES OF MEMORY LOSS." so wouldn't we need something to substantiate this difference? As in something which tells us that this difference exists.
As per your analysis, "One way to strengthen the conclusion is to eliminate a possible difference between the two groups of people." Why are we eliminating this difference?
Join the discussion