determining relevant info

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 6:29 am
Thanked: 17 times
Followed by:1 members

determining relevant info

by rahul.s » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:10 pm
Accountant: The residents of Trenakintown have long supported the building of a large shopping mall in the town's center, and almost every winter the local newspaper has reported that the town's best construction company, Buildacorp, plans to begin such a project by the summer, but this construction has never begun. However, we have just learned that this winter, Buildacorp has satisfied the budget allocation requirement for large-scale construction projects by submitting a detailed breakdown of proposed expenditures to Trenakintown's Committee of Special Projects. So, it is very likely that Buildacorp will begin construction of the large shopping mall in the town's center this summer.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the accountant's argument?

A) Has any other construction company that has satisfied the budget allocation requirement for large-scale construction projects reported a lower estimate of its proposed expenditures?

B) Is submitting a detailed break down of proposed expenditures the only way to satisfy Trenakintown's Committee of Special Projects's budget allocation requirements?

C) Did the information recently reported by the accountant come directly from Trenakintown's Committee of Special Projects?

D) Is the amount that Buildacorp proposes to spend greater than what the Committee had anticipated?

E) Has Buildacorp also satisfied the budget allocation requirements for large-scale construction projects before any other summers?

OA: E
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 6:29 am
Thanked: 17 times
Followed by:1 members

by rahul.s » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:14 pm
i was initially confused between B and E. just as i was about to select option E, i noticed the words 'However, we have just learned that this winter, Buildacorp has satisfied the budget allocation requirement for large-scale construction projects by submitting a detailed breakdown of proposed expenditures to Trenakintown's Committee of Special Projects.'

it states that this winter, Buildacorp satisfied the required budget allocation. hence, i assumed that, in the previous years, they had not satisfied this criterion. so it would reasonable to know whether this is the only prerequisite, would it not?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: Hyderabad
Thanked: 12 times

by vijay_venky » Tue Feb 02, 2010 3:44 am
Let us break this down,

Accountant:

P1. Residents supported the construction for a very long time.
P2. every winter the local news paper published that Buildacorp plans to begin.
P3. but the construction never began.

P4. but this winter we learned that BC satisfied the body for budget allocation.
P5. so it is very likely that the company will begin its construction.

Assuming that the use of but signifies the uniqueness of the measure (satisfying the body), I would say is not appropriate.
because we have not been apprised of the procedures followed in the past.

now let us say we are held up with the two options that you have mentioned in the previous post.

B- Now either the answer is an yes or a no, it was provided in the stimulus that the company has satisfied the body. Now whether there is any other way of satisfying the body is irrelevant.

I found A closer, but "lower estimate" was something that I was skeptical of.

So I chose E.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 5:53 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by dmitriyaleyev » Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:42 pm
E
We know the project couldnt be started for years. We may then assume that every year the plan was proposed but the project was still on freeze. hence, what makes us think that the fact of satisfying comission means a start of a project?