BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Deviding and subtracting inequalities

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Aug 13, 2010 7:55 am
Jinglander wrote:MGMAT says never do this. Can someone explain why
We can use counter examples to see why we can't divide, subtract or multiply inequalities.

- We know that 2<13 and 8<14, but when we subtract we get: (8-2)<(14-13), which simplifies to be 6<1 (no good

- Similarly, we know that 3<10 and 15<20, but when we divide we get: (15/3)<(20/10), which simplifies to be 5<2 (no good)

- Finally, we know that -3<-2 and 0<1, but when we multiply we get: (-3 x 0)<(-2 x 1), which simplifies to be 0<-2 (no good)

We can use logic to see why adding is okay. We'll use money as an example.

If Rod has more money than Bart (R>B), and Tod has more money than Lisa (T>L), then we also know that the combined wealth of Rod and Tod (R+T) will be greater than the combined wealth of Bart and Lisa (B+L).

In other word, if R>B and T>L then (R+T)>(B+L)
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Jinglander » Fri Aug 13, 2010 7:58 am
Well you can multiply if everything is positive
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Aug 13, 2010 10:14 am
Jinglander wrote:Well you can multiply if everything is positive
Sure we can create some rules if we place certain restriction on the values.
However, if we place no restrictions, then addition is the only operation we can apply to combine inequalities.
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Jinglander » Fri Aug 13, 2010 10:23 am
What would the restrictions for subtracting and dividing
Join the discussion