-
vivek.kapoor83
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 833
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:56 am
- Thanked: 13 times
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Featured Course
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
cr ques
Source: Beat The GMAT — Critical Reasoning |
Here is my justification.
E states that "Whether survey respondents' reports of time spent using computers included time spent using computers at work".
If the answer to that is No, which means that "Reports of time spent included only free time", then it strengthens the conclusion.
If the answer is Yes, that means "Reports of time spent includes time spent using computers at work", then it weakens the conclusion. The reason is that the premise talks only about the free time spent on computers.
E states that "Whether survey respondents' reports of time spent using computers included time spent using computers at work".
If the answer to that is No, which means that "Reports of time spent included only free time", then it strengthens the conclusion.
If the answer is Yes, that means "Reports of time spent includes time spent using computers at work", then it weakens the conclusion. The reason is that the premise talks only about the free time spent on computers.
E
If the respondents spent most of their time using computers at work, they would still have time to watch television and hence the need to complain will not arise.
If the respondents spent most of their time using computers at work, they would still have time to watch television and hence the need to complain will not arise.
can u guys pls explain..what does ques exactly means...is is luking for strengthing the argument or weaking it. ?
Computer based activities were expected to increase the time spent on computers.But that assumtion as the author mentions turned out to be false.Why? The author quotes his evidence that -- a very large majority of respondents who used a lot computers....
When the author is quoting the above to actually evidence that people spend less time on computers--the first thing one would need to know evaluate is -If the respondents spent most of their time using computers at work
When the author is quoting the above to actually evidence that people spend less time on computers--the first thing one would need to know evaluate is -If the respondents spent most of their time using computers at work
that mean u have to look out for the option, which makes arguement more valid. and prove that it is correct.
We have to select a choice which either strengthen it or weaken it..
E is waekeinig the argument....how?
the argument is based upon "free time"
If evidence is based upon "work time" then the argument is weakened..
E is waekeinig the argument....how?
the argument is based upon "free time"
If evidence is based upon "work time" then the argument is weakened..
