Demand for vs demand in

Expert replies

champmag: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 234; Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:02 amFollowed by: 3 members; Thanked: 5 times

by champmag » Sun May 08, 2011 11:31 pm

Because of less availability and greater demand for scientific research, platinum remains consistently expensive, like gold.

1.)Because of less availability and greater demand for scientific research, platinum remains consistently expensive, like gold.
2.)Because of less availability and increased demand for scientific research, platinum remains consistently expensive, like that of gold.
3.)Because of decreased availability and increased demand in scientific research, platinum remains expensive, like gold.
4.)Because of decreased availability and increased demand for scientific research, platinum remains expensive, like gold.
5.)Because of decreased availability and greater demand in scientific research, platinum remains at a consistently high price, like that of gold.

Like this post

Source: Beat The GMAT — Sentence Correction | Sun May 08, 2011 11:31 pm

cracktheverbal: Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts; Posts: 12; Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:10 am; Thanked: 2 times

by cracktheverbal » Mon May 09, 2011 12:09 am

You might check this post, Ron explained in a very comprehensive way:
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/bec ... 2.html[url]

Hope it helps. [/url]

Like this post

bubbliiiiiiii: Legendary Member; Posts: 979; Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:38 amFollowed by: 12 members; Location: Hyderabad, India; Thanked: 49 times; GMAT Score:700

by bubbliiiiiiii » Mon May 09, 2011 12:11 am

1, 2 and 4 - demand for

3 and 5 - demand in.

Demand in v/s Demand for.

I think both of them are correct and its usage has to be picked from context.

In this case, I would pick demand in as this correctly describes the usage of platinum in Scientific research.

Thus, IMO C.

Regards,

Pranay

Like this post

HSPA: Legendary Member; Posts: 1101; Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 amFollowed by: 13 members; Thanked: 47 times; GMAT Score:640

by HSPA » Mon May 09, 2011 12:56 am

Decread availability of platinum is correct [ 3/4/5]

5] Is out because decreased and greater are not parallel

Now as requested in the headline fight is btw 3 and 4. Both 'demand in' and 'demand for' are meaningful entities.

Let us re-write as: Platinum is used more extensivly in scientific research.

First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.

Like this post

GMATGuruNY: GMAT Instructor; Posts: 15539; Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pmFollowed by: 1906 members; Location: New York, NY; Thanked: 13060 times; GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Mon May 09, 2011 3:34 am

champmag wrote:Because of less availability and greater demand for scientific research, platinum remains consistently expensive, like gold.

1.)Because of less availability and greater demand for scientific research, platinum remains consistently expensive, like gold.
2.)Because of less availability and increased demand for scientific research, platinum remains consistently expensive, like that of gold.
3.)Because of decreased availability and increased demand in scientific research, platinum remains expensive, like gold.
4.)Because of decreased availability and increased demand for scientific research, platinum remains expensive, like gold.
5.)Because of decreased availability and greater demand in scientific research, platinum remains at a consistently high price, like that of gold.

Look for easy reasons to eliminate answers.

In A, B and E, remains and consistently are redundant. Eliminate A, B and E.

In D, demand FOR scientific research incorrectly implies that there is a desire FOR scientific research. The intended meaning of the sentence is that there is a desire for PLATINUM. Eliminate D.

The correct answer is C.

To clarify:
A demand for X means that people want X.
A demand in X means that X is an area in which people want something.
X is in demand means that X is popular.

Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Like this post

Post new topic Locked

• Page 1 of 1

GMAT Course Reviews

560 reviews

1168 reviews

431 reviews

359 reviews

147 reviews

5/5

5 Star (560 Reviews)

"Target Test Prep is the closest to the official version of the GMAT exam, about 99% accuracy in terms of the quality and quantity of information. The course has excellently created singular sets of focused lessons and tests for every possible topic that one could come across in the official GMAT exam."

"The TTP course maximizes the efficiency of the time you spend studying. It will take time and effort but I could almost guarantee that if you complete the course exactly as it is laid out you will get an amazing score. They also have a very responsive team willing to help with any questions you might have."

"TTP has two things that I think no other test prep company offers: A teaching approach that reinforces understanding and an attitude that will give you the mental preparedness needed to succeed on the test. TTP gives you a deep understanding of the concept you need to know while teaching you how to think."

Write a Review