BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Deceptively simple

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by eaakbari » Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:06 am
kstv wrote:If x and y are +ve integers, are x & y squares of consecutive numbers?

A . √x + y = 7
B . √y + x = 11

IMO C
Last edited by eaakbari on Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Whether you think you can or can't, you're right.
- Henry Ford
Join the discussion

by eaakbari » Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:10 am
On rethinking I am a little confused, the question doesnt explicitly state whether x and y are squares. If they are not answer is E and if they are its A.
Let me assume they are

Statement one
Check squares of a number lesser than 7 that is 4 and 1 which makes options for x any y as 36 and 1 or 4 and 9 . hence Insuff

Statement two
There are 2 possibilities as there are 2 squares less than 11, x can be 4 or 9.Hence Insuff

Combining
4 and 9 is common possibility

Hence C
Last edited by eaakbari on Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
Whether you think you can or can't, you're right.
- Henry Ford
Join the discussion

by harshavardhanc » Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:16 am
kstv wrote:If x and y are +ve integers, are x & y squares of consecutive numbers?

A . √x + y = 7
B . √y + x = 11
Statement 1:

if X=36 and Y= 1 (X and Y are not squares of consecutive integers)
if X=9 and Y=4 (X and Y ARE squares of consecutive integers)

hence, this is insufficient.


Statement 2:

we have to consider following set of values for (Y,X) :
(100,1)(81,2)(64,3)(49,4)(36,5)(25,6)(16,7)(9,8)(4,9)(1,10)

for the emboldened set the answer is YES.
for all the others, the answer is NO.

Hence, insufficient.

combining these two : only (X=9 and Y=4) is common.

Hence, C is the answer.
Regards,
Harsha
Join the discussion

by eaakbari » Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:19 am
harshavardhanc wrote:
kstv wrote:If x and y are +ve integers, are x & y squares of consecutive numbers?

A . √x + y = 7
B . √y + x = 11
Statement 1:

if X=36 and Y= 1 (X and Y are not squares of consecutive integers)
if X=9 and Y=4 (X and Y ARE squares of consecutive integers)

hence, this is insufficient.


Statement 2:

we have to consider following set of values for (Y,X) :
(100,1)(81,2)(64,3)(49,4)(36,5)(25,6)(16,7)(9,8)(4,9)(1,10)

for the emboldened set the answer is YES.
for all the others, the answer is NO.

Hence, insufficient.

combining these two : only (X=9 and Y=4) is common.

Hence, C is the answer.
Oh yes I totally forgot about the number 1 for statement one. Thanks , I shall edit my post
Whether you think you can or can't, you're right.
- Henry Ford
Join the discussion

by akahuja143 » Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:32 am
Thanks for explanation guys!!! you guys will surely nail 50 in Quant section
Join the discussion

by eaakbari » Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:59 am
Thank you akahuja, lets keep our fingers crossed and hope we all get 50 in Quant :wink:

E
Whether you think you can or can't, you're right.
- Henry Ford
Join the discussion

by pops » Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:46 am
kstv wrote:If x and y are +ve integers, are x & y squares of consecutive numbers?

A . √x + y = 7
B . √y + x = 11
A new approach to the problem.
To suffice the question condition:
(i) x=(k+1)^2 and y=k^2 or
(ii) x=k^2 and y=(k+1)^2

statement 1: plugging in x and y from (i) and (ii)
k+1+k^2 =7 or k+(k+1)^2=7 (plugging (i) and (ii))
k^2+k-6=0 or k^2+3k-6=0
k=3 or -2 or non integer values !
now since we are not able to nail down on one value this is insufficient

statement 2: plugging in x and y from (i) and (ii)
k+(k+1)^2=11 or k+1+k^2=11
k^2+3k-10=0 or k^2+k-10=0
k=5,-2 or non integer values !
now since we are not able to nail down on one value this is also insufficient

combining the above 2 statements we have one common value hence C!

does anyone see any problem with this method ?
Join the discussion

by eaakbari » Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:05 am
pops wrote:
kstv wrote:If x and y are +ve integers, are x & y squares of consecutive numbers?

A . √x + y = 7
B . √y + x = 11
A new approach to the problem.
To suffice the question condition:
(i) x=(k+1)^2 and y=k^2 or
(ii) x=k^2 and y=(k+1)^2

statement 1: plugging in x and y from (i) and (ii)
k+1+k^2 =7 or k+(k+1)^2=7 (plugging (i) and (ii))
k^2+k-6=0 or k^2+3k-6=0
k=3 or -2 or non integer values !
now since we are not able to nail down on one value this is insufficient

statement 2: plugging in x and y from (i) and (ii)
k+(k+1)^2=11 or k+1+k^2=11
k^2+3k-10=0 or k^2+k-10=0
k=5,-2 or non integer values !
now since we are not able to nail down on one value this is also insufficient

combining the above 2 statements we have one common value hence C!

does anyone see any problem with this method ?
In my view , its not wrong and its a different approach but definitely more tedious. You might cross 2 mins while solving
Whether you think you can or can't, you're right.
- Henry Ford
Join the discussion