BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Data Sufficiency Question : Average

Expert replies
by kfat » Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:58 pm
The average height of a group of children is 125 cm. If one of the children leaves, the average height drops by 2 cm. how many kids were there originally?
(1) The height of the child who left is twice greater than the height of the shortest child.
(2) The height of the child who left is 130 cm.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by boazkhan » Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:08 pm
IMO A. what is the OA?
Join the discussion

by barcebal » Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:05 pm
I want to say B but something isn't right.

n=number of original kids

(123*(n-1) + 130)/n = 125 right?

Simplified you get 125n = 123n -123 + 130

Simplify again and you 2n = 7

N=7/2

You can't have 7/2 kids. We get a value but we don't get a real answer? Are you sure the numbers are right?

Statement I seems not sufficient too. You can't really use the info about the smallest kid to infer how many kids there are and write an equation like I did in Statement B because we don't know how the smallest kid affects the avg.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Mon Jul 12, 2010 11:40 pm
kfat wrote:The average height of a group of children is 125 cm. If one of the children leaves, the average height drops by 2 cm. how many kids were there originally?
(1) The height of the child who left is twice greater than the height of the shortest child.
(2) The height of the child who left is 130 cm.
St 2 should be sufficient. But the numbers are contradictory...
Join the discussion

by kfat » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:26 am
Guys... The questions and figures in the questions both are correct. This problem was in 700-800 toughness level. Many a times persons sees a linear equation and marks the answer.

The answer for this question is "E". Person needs to solve to get n = 7/2 to avoid marking answer as "B".
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Jul 13, 2010 8:55 am
kfat wrote:Guys... The questions and figures in the questions both are correct. This problem was in 700-800 toughness level. Many a times persons sees a linear equation and marks the answer.

The answer for this question is "E". Person needs to solve to get n = 7/2 to avoid marking answer as "B".
This question would never appear on the GMAT. The GMAT writers will never suggest an equation that results in 7/2 of a person.

(The justification for answer choice E seems to be that when you use the information given, you get 7/2 of a person, and since this number makes no sense, the statement is insufficient. You'll never face this situation on the GMAT.)
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by barcebal » Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:14 am
kfat wrote:Guys... The questions and figures in the questions both are correct. This problem was in 700-800 toughness level. Many a times persons sees a linear equation and marks the answer.

The answer for this question is "E". Person needs to solve to get n = 7/2 to avoid marking answer as "B".
I agree with GMATguruNY,

The information in the question is inherently true and so is each statement. So if the facts given in the question are TRUE and statement 2 is TRUE (I'm not saying sufficient, I'm saying TRUE) then you get n = 7/2, which cannot answer the question, NOT BECAUSE statement 2 is unsufficient, but because either (A) the question's facts are incorrect or (B) statement 2 is false, both of which CAN NOT occur because we're not being tested on whether the statement is true, but rather sufficient.
Join the discussion