BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Data Sufficiency problem from Princeton Review

Expert replies
by pranavc » Tue May 13, 2008 1:20 pm
I have trouble with the question below. Any help would be much appreciated.

3. The members of the newest recruiting class of a certain military organization are taking their physical conditioning test, and those who score in the bottom 16% will have to retest. If the scores are normally distributed, and have an arithmetic mean of 72, what is the score at or below which recruits have to retest?

(1) There are 500 recruits in the class.
(2) 10 recruits 82 or higher.

(A) Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

(B) Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.

(C) BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement alone is sufficient.

(D) EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.

(E) Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.



I have the solution and the explanation for the question above but I am not entirely convinced of the explanation.

The solution indicates that those 1- top-scoring recruits make up the top 2% (I agree) of the class as a whole – and since the scores are normally distributed, the top 2% represents the third standard deviation above the mean (this is the bit I do not agree with). The top 0.3% represents the third standard deviation above the mean. The top 2% mark is somewhere in between the second and third standard deviation above the mean. Is it still acceptable to approximate “upwards” to the third standard deviation? Forgive my ignorance if this an acceptable assumption. Any input would be much appreciated. Thank you in advance.


Regards,

Pranav
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Alejandro » Tue May 20, 2008 5:31 am
which one is the answer the book propose?
Join the discussion

by pranavc » Tue May 20, 2008 6:34 am
The answer is C.
Join the discussion

by mim3 » Tue May 20, 2008 9:19 am
I think that their explanation is unnecessarily complicated. I got to C a different way (I think):

1. 500 recruits.
We know that the 500 recruits are normally (evenly) distributed across the range of scores with a mean of 72... but we don't know what the range is, so we can't say what the 16th percentile is/how many recruits are below. Insufficient.

2. 10 recruits scored 82 or higher.
Without knowing how many recruits we have we don't know what percentage the 10 recruits represent. Insufficent.

Together, we know that there are 500 recruits and that 10 of them (98th percentile) scored 82 or higher. So, 82 represents the 98th percentile. You can do the computation to find out how many troops fell below the 16th percentile, but you don't have to. Because we know we can, 1&2 together are sufficient and the answer is C.
Join the discussion

by chidcguy » Tue May 20, 2008 4:29 pm
Together, we know that there are 500 recruits and that 10 of them (98th percentile) scored 82 or higher. So, 82 represents the 98th percentile.

I agree until here that 10 members scored in the top 98th percentile and to score in top 98 percentile, one has to score >= 82

You can do the computation to find out how many troops fell below the 16th percentile, but you don't have to. Because we know we can, 1&2 together are sufficient and the answer is C.

I don't understand how we can say that if we know 98th percentile score, we can tell what is the 16th percentile score?

Are you saying that if 82 is the score for 98th percentile, (16/98)X82 is the score for the 16th percentile? Can you this with percentiles?
Join the discussion

by akshatsingh » Tue May 20, 2008 9:17 pm
This question can certainly clear the concepts of normalisation.

Experts please solve to explain the actual answer and not just to answer the 'data sufficiency'.

Help would be really appreciated.

Thanks in advance.
Aks
Join the discussion

by netigen » Wed May 21, 2008 12:13 am
Table to know in this case

range % distribution
1SD 68.26895
2SD 95.44997
3SD 99.73002
4SD 99.99366
5SD 99.99994

this means the you need to find out the SD to solve this problem. If you know the SD you know that the answer will be between 2SD to 3SD below the average
Join the discussion

by akshatsingh » Wed May 21, 2008 1:05 am
sorry, but this still doesnt help me much..

Is this a standard table ? or a derived one for this problem ?
Aks
Join the discussion

by pranavc » Wed May 21, 2008 12:33 pm
I agree about the answer being between 2 and three standard deviations below the mean but doesn't a data sufficiency question try and ask us if we can determine a finite answer as opposed to a range? I am still struggling with the bit about 82 being rounded up to the 98th percentile. Any input would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Pranav
Join the discussion