BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Data related to the past 30 years reveals some interesting i

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Wed Nov 07, 2018 5:50 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty—

Data related to the past 30 years reveals some interesting insights about the propensity of a country to go into a war. Over the past 30 years, the countries that maintained the highest military strengths were also more aggressively involved in a higher number of wars. Moreover, the likelihood of getting aggressively involved in a war increased for countries whose military strength increased significantly during this period. Since there was no major world-wide war phenomenon in the recent past, it is likely that an increased military strength causes the increase in aggressive behavior and the higher involvement in wars.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A.The data doesn't distinguish between the countries that were consistently involved in war and the countries that were involved in more wars during the beginning and end of the 30-year period.
B. Some countries cited in the data were rarely involved in any war
C.Data shows that none of the countries that had zero increase in military strength showed any increase in their involvement in wars.
D.Situations that trigger an increase in military strength such as political tensions with neighboring countries are also likely to increase a country's propensity to become involved in wars.
E.Data related to some of these countries is available only for a partial duration out of the 30-year period

OA C

Source: e-GMAT
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

edited

by deloitte247 » Fri Nov 09, 2018 11:36 pm
In a bid to answering this question it is important to bear in mind that we look forward to picking the option that strengthens the argument the most.

Option A:- Incorrect
On the contrary, the data specified that there exists some countries who maintained their military might and more importantly get involved in war more often than not. There is no need to distinguish between such since there is high propensity for countries with increasing military strength to be involved in more wars than others. It is thus a weaker point.

Option B:- Incorrect
It is not entirely correct because the argument centres countries with increasing military strength having higher capacity to battle on the war front.

Option C:- correct
This is like summarising the whole argument in this option statement. countries with no increase in military capacity have no tendency of getting involved in fighting wars. This is the strong point of the writer's argument.

Option D:- Incorrect
Political situations and unwarranted external aggressions could lead countries to develop their military more thereby increasing their propensity to engage in war. This is true but contrary to what the question specified which is providing argument that MOST Valid argument though incorrect.

Option E:- Incorrect
It is dependent on when the development of the military apparatus began or countries trying to keep data away from prying eyes of their enemy countries.
Join the discussion