-
BTGmoderatorRO
- Moderator
- Posts: 772
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 6:29 pm
- Followed by:6 members
Cheetah Sweet, a popular energy drink, has recently released a line of zero calorie energy drinks for athletes who seek flavor and hydration without sugar. But Cheetah Sweet's zero calorie drinks contain a number of chemicals known to have a deleterious effect on the body, so clearly these athletes would be better served by consuming regular Cheetah Sweet instead.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(a). The chemicals affect anyone who drinks Cheetah Sweet's zero calorie line.
(b). Cheetah Sweet's zero calorie line cannot be altered to remove the chemicals.
(c). Regular Cheetah Sweet is at least as tasty as Cheetah Sweet's zero calorie line.
(d). Sugar does not have a more deleterious effect on the body than the chemicals in question.
(e). Cheetah Sweet has no plans to discontinue its regular line.
OA is D
I was stuck between D and E but how do you know the best answer here? An Expert help is needed pls.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(a). The chemicals affect anyone who drinks Cheetah Sweet's zero calorie line.
(b). Cheetah Sweet's zero calorie line cannot be altered to remove the chemicals.
(c). Regular Cheetah Sweet is at least as tasty as Cheetah Sweet's zero calorie line.
(d). Sugar does not have a more deleterious effect on the body than the chemicals in question.
(e). Cheetah Sweet has no plans to discontinue its regular line.
OA is D
I was stuck between D and E but how do you know the best answer here? An Expert help is needed pls.
