BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Crazy CR - MGMAT CAT 5

Expert replies
by ankur.agrawal » Fri Apr 15, 2011 3:09 am
In response to the increasing cost of producing energy through traditional means, such as combustion, many utility companies have begun investing in renewable energy sources, chiefly wind and solar power, hoping someday to rely on them completely and thus lower energy costs. The utility companies claim that although these sources require significant initial capital investment, they will provide stable energy supplies at low cost. As a result, these sources will be less risky for the utilities than nonrenewable sources, such as gas, oil, and coal, whose prices can fluctuate dramatically according to availability.

The claim of the utility companies presupposes which of the following?

The public will embrace the development of wind and solar power.

No new deposits of gas, oil, and coal will be discovered in the near future.

Weather patterns are consistent and predictable.

The necessary technology for conversion to wind and solar power is not more expensive than the technology needed to create energy through combustion.

Obtaining energy from nonrenewable sources, such as gas, oil and coal, cannot be made less risky.

OA after some discussion
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by HSPA » Fri Apr 15, 2011 3:43 am
Now it is btw B and C.

I will go with weather stability

1)cost and availability are two different aspects which B tries to trap into..
2) words stating "stable energy sources at low cost for wind power" => wind flow is constant
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by AIM GMAT » Fri Apr 15, 2011 3:59 am
Conclusion that renewable sorces will be less risky . So argument is assuming that the sources can be tapped without any disruption and that is possible if the weather is consistent and predicatable.

IMO C.

Attack conclusion .
Thanks & Regards,
AIM GMAT
Join the discussion

by ankur.agrawal » Fri Apr 15, 2011 4:16 am
BRAVO! U GUYS NAILED IT . OA IS INDEED C

THANKS A LOT.
Join the discussion

by Tani » Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:55 pm
The key here is that the utility companies want to avoid fluctuations. Where I live weather fluctuations are a lot worse even than gas prices! That points to C.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion