The closest thing to the real test is GMATprep, which you can download at mba.com. Most people take test #1 from this software to know where they stand (i.e. figure out a baseline score). Historically, I understand Veritas and Princeton are a bit generous with scoring.

I am going to take the mba.com test soon, but does scoring so low on Veritas test mean that there needs to be a rigorous improvement to touch the coveted 700 mark?
I just got 5 questions wrong on the test, but still managed only 45 on Quant. Although my Verbal was pathetic, I don't think scoring 45 on Quant is justified.
Can you please throw some light on this since my morale after these two tests is highly low and i am planning to re-schedule my test date?

Your suggestions are highly required on this since I am going to take the test the second time and am scoring lower than I was in my previous attempt. I hadn't tried Crack the gmat and Veritas the last time, so don't know exactly where I stand.

Getting just 5 wrong will likely put you somewhere around 47-50. I don't think a 45 is accurate, unless you got all 5 wrong in a row. I can't really say for sure how low (if low, that is) your real score is. My opinion is that your previous attempt should be your baseline score: use that as something to build upon, working on your weaknesses.

Hi Dana,
I just took a MGMAT Online Test and scored 680 on that, although I had to pause the Maths part for last 5-6 odd questions, considering the Maths on MGMAT is tougher than expected.
Got 14 wrong in Quant and 16 Wrong in Verbal.
Scaled Average - Quant - 48, Verbal - 34.
Am a bit confused whether this is the right scaled average.
Can you suggest whether I should go ahead and take the test next week, aiming 700 or above with a 680 score in MGMAT. I am planning to re-schedule my test since I don't feel confident in RC, making more than 50% mistakes still.