BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR - Weakening the Argument

Expert replies
by nishant1309 » Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:00 am
Representative: Our prisons have been criticized for having what some say are inadequate facilities. While it is true that there are still many improvements to be made, critics should consider that improving the prisons has been one of the state's primary concerns in the past few years. In fact, we have spent more money on this project than on any other, for the past few years.

Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously undermines the reasoning in the representative's argument?

A. Prison systems in neighboring states have also been criticized for having inadequate facilities.

B. In the past few years, there has been a sharp increase in the number of felony convictions in this state.

C. Only states with presently inadequate facilities would need to allocate large amounts of money to the prison system.

D. In general, prison systems require more money to maintain than other institutions of a comparable size.

E. State funds should go toward improving the economy and eradicating homelessness, not improving the prisons.

I will put OA later on after we have a few reasonable discussions on this question. My Choice: E.

Thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by HSPA » Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:11 am
Opinion: What is the reason given? Find it... kill it
We have spent more money on this project than anyother in past few years

E) Out of scope... topic is on prison not homelessness
A) strengthens
B) Not bad...funds are kept on increased convicts and not to facilites
C) What happens to other prisons funding is a DONT CARE
D) Other institutes... irrelevent

IMO B
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Sun Mar 13, 2011 9:21 am
I would go with C............

A wrong because out of scope
B wrong because increase in the crimes doesn't weaken anything
D wrong bec nothing is mentioned about other institutions
E wrong awkward

Wats the OA????
Join the discussion

by Tani » Sun Mar 13, 2011 11:31 am
I concur with C. The conclusion of this argument is vague, but it appears that the author is telling us not to criticize the system for inadequate facilities. His reason - we've spent tons of money improving them.

C says - "yeah, you've spent a ton of money, but it's because the system was a mess to begin with." That position is corroborated by the author's admission that there are still many improvements to be made.

While it is true that increasing convictions would most likely increase the prison population, we are told only that the facilities are "inadequate" and need improvements, not that they are overcrowded.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion

by nishant1309 » Sun Mar 13, 2011 12:34 pm
Tani Wolff - Kaplan wrote:I concur with C. The conclusion of this argument is vague, but it appears that the author is telling us not to criticize the system for inadequate facilities. His reason - we've spent tons of money improving them.

C says - "yeah, you've spent a ton of money, but it's because the system was a mess to begin with." That position is corroborated by the author's admission that there are still many improvements to be made.

While it is true that increasing convictions would most likely increase the prison population, we are told only that the facilities are "inadequate" and need improvements, not that they are overcrowded.
Thanks Tani! OA is option "C".
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Sun Mar 13, 2011 10:39 pm
I read "only" as "other".... I am sorry Nishi and to myself as well...
Join the discussion

by wayofjungle » Mon Mar 14, 2011 9:07 pm
I also say 'C' is the best answer choice.

The conclusion: "critics should consider that improving the prisons has been one of the state's primary concerns in the past few years"

The assumptions: improvements have not been made yet, greater improvement and more money is needed before criticism will stop, inadequate facilities are the only reason the prisons are criticized, etc.

(A) outside scope of argument
(B) might strengthen argument
(C) Best answer choice, tackles the assumption that states more money is needed
(D) sounds true, but outside scope. We dont know anything about other institutions of comparable size.
(E) Too specific and judgmental
Join the discussion