BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR WEAKEN- SENSES

Expert replies
by vishalwin » Fri Dec 04, 2015 11:33 pm
The five senses have traditionally been viewed as distinct yet complementary. Each sense is thought to have its own range of stimuli that are incapable of stimulating the other senses. However, recent research has discovered that some people taste a banana and claim that they are tasting blue, or see a
color and say that it has a specific smell. This shows that such people, called synesthesiacs, have senses that do not respect the usual boundaries between the five recognized senses.


Which one of the following statements, if true, most
seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Synesthesiacs demonstrate a general,
systematic impairment in their ability to use
and understand words.

(B) Recent evidence strongly suggests that there
are other senses besides sight, touch, smell,
hearing, and taste.

(C) The particular ways in which sensory
experiences overlap in synesthesiacs follow a
definite pattern.

(D) The synesthetic phenomenon has been
described in the legends of various cultures.

(E) Synesthesiacs can be temporarily rid of their
synesthetic experiences by the use of drugs.


Confused between A and B.

I thought B states that there is some other sense that is responsible for the synesthetic experiences.


Can you please explain.

Source : POWERSCORE GMAT CR

OA: A
Thanks & Regards
vishalwin
------------------------------------
GMAT Score - 530
I will BEAT the GMAT!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by MartyMurray » Sat Dec 05, 2015 4:31 am
vishalwin wrote:Confused between A and B.
(A) Synesthesiacs demonstrate a general,
systematic impairment in their ability to use
and understand words.

This clearly undermines the argument that what synesthesiacs are saying about sensory experiences indicates that they have overlapping senses, because it provides evidence that there is actually a completely different reason for what is going on. So called synesthesiacs are merely using the wrong words.

(B) Recent evidence strongly suggests that there
are other senses besides sight, touch, smell,
hearing, and taste.

This could mean a variety of things, some of which would weaken the argument and some of which would strengthen it. To weaken the argument using this answer choice you need to create a convoluted story. The right CR answer choice will not be right because of a convoluted story. Rather it will be clearly and directly related to the prompt and question.

Alternatively this answer choice could be seen as strengthening the argument, because it tends to support the conclusion that synesthesiacs have senses other than the five recognized senses.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Thu Oct 13, 2016 6:30 am
Hi Marty,

I selected the right choice here A and eliminated B as completely OFS.

However, on reading your explanation I was intrigued by this line.

Alternatively this answer choice could be seen as strengthening the argument, because it tends to support the conclusion that synesthesiacs have senses other than the five recognized senses.

I want to understand how does this strengthen the argument. Because the only thing that the conclusion says is that there is an overlap between the 5 senses. In my opinion, By saying that there are more than 5 recognized senses has no effect on the conclusion at all.

Please clarify this doubt?
Join the discussion

by MartyMurray » Mon Oct 17, 2016 5:23 am
[email protected] wrote:Hi Marty,

I selected the right choice here A and eliminated B as completely OFS.

However, on reading your explanation I was intrigued by this line.

Alternatively this answer choice could be seen as strengthening the argument, because it tends to support the conclusion that synesthesiacs have senses other than the five recognized senses.

I want to understand how does this strengthen the argument. Because the only thing that the conclusion says is that there is an overlap between the 5 senses. In my opinion, By saying that there are more than 5 recognized senses has no effect on the conclusion at all.

Please clarify this doubt?
I see what you are saying, and while the conclusion could clearer by being a little differently worded, I guess you nailed it.

I had gotten the impression that synesthesiacs potentially have "other" senses, but I guess actually the point is that synesthesiacs have basically the same senses that everyone else has, but in synesthesiacs those senses overlap.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Join the discussion