BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CR - The American Revolution

Expert replies
by SubratGmat2011 » Tue Sep 28, 2010 9:50 pm
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general search warrants, which gave arbitrary and
intrusive powers to government officers. Thus, the founders created the Fourth Amendment to protect against
unreasonable and warrant-less intrusions of privacy by a powerful and partisan federal government. During the
20th century, countless dictators have used arbitrary and intrusive surveillance to monitor and suppress dissidents.
Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent. Which of
the following, if true, best weakens the argument?
"¢ The United Kingdom's parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically
suppressed dissent.
"¢ Many dictators have been very beneficial and constructive leaders for their countries.
"¢ Many democracies have haphazardly used surveillance to monitor dissidents and suppress dissent during times of
war.
"¢ Some dictators have been supported by the United States.
"¢ At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by saurabhmahajan » Tue Sep 28, 2010 11:27 pm
IMO: A

Because:

1) The United Kingdom's parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically
suppressed dissent. Wekaens the statement Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent

2) Many dictators have been very beneficial and constructive leaders for their countries. Does not make any comments from statement countless dictators have used arbitrary and intrusive surveillance to monitor and suppress dissidents

3) Many democracies have haphazardly used surveillance to monitor dissidents and suppress dissent during times of
war. Does not make any strong comment to weaken the argument

4) Some dictators have been supported by the United States. out of scope

5) At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent. Does not mean forcefully or systematically
Thanks and regards,
Saurabh Mahajan

I can understand you not winning,but i will not forgive you for not trying.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Tue Sep 28, 2010 11:52 pm
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Wed Sep 29, 2010 8:24 am
SubratGmat2011 wrote:The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general search warrants, which gave arbitrary and
intrusive powers to government officers. Thus, the founders created the Fourth Amendment to protect against
unreasonable and warrant-less intrusions of privacy by a powerful and partisan federal government. During the
20th century, countless dictators have used arbitrary and intrusive surveillance to monitor and suppress dissidents.
Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent. Which of
the following, if true, best weakens the argument?
"¢ The United Kingdom's parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically
suppressed dissent.
"¢ Many dictators have been very beneficial and constructive leaders for their countries.
"¢ Many democracies have haphazardly used surveillance to monitor dissidents and suppress dissent during times of
war.
"¢ Some dictators have been supported by the United States.
"¢ At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent.
i will choose A for this CR.. its so difficulto understand it.
i chose A because the conclusion said ANY democracy country that doesnt enforce protection WILL supress dissent
and A states UK doesnt enforce protection and UK also suppressed dissent.
what is the answer?
Join the discussion

by g000fy » Wed Sep 29, 2010 9:20 am
A is the best pick. Reason same as given by diebeatsthegmat
Join the discussion

by hitmis » Wed Sep 29, 2010 7:12 pm
This one is tricky. imo A
Join the discussion