Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

CR - The American Revolution

Expert replies
by SubratGmat2011 » Tue Sep 28, 2010 9:50 pm
The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general search warrants, which gave arbitrary and
intrusive powers to government officers. Thus, the founders created the Fourth Amendment to protect against
unreasonable and warrant-less intrusions of privacy by a powerful and partisan federal government. During the
20th century, countless dictators have used arbitrary and intrusive surveillance to monitor and suppress dissidents.
Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent. Which of
the following, if true, best weakens the argument?
• The United Kingdom’s parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically
suppressed dissent.
• Many dictators have been very beneficial and constructive leaders for their countries.
• Many democracies have haphazardly used surveillance to monitor dissidents and suppress dissent during times of
war.
• Some dictators have been supported by the United States.
• At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by saurabhmahajan » Tue Sep 28, 2010 11:27 pm
IMO: A

Because:

1) The United Kingdom’s parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically
suppressed dissent. Wekaens the statement Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent

2) Many dictators have been very beneficial and constructive leaders for their countries. Does not make any comments from statement countless dictators have used arbitrary and intrusive surveillance to monitor and suppress dissidents

3) Many democracies have haphazardly used surveillance to monitor dissidents and suppress dissent during times of
war. Does not make any strong comment to weaken the argument

4) Some dictators have been supported by the United States. out of scope

5) At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent. Does not mean forcefully or systematically
Thanks and regards,
Saurabh Mahajan

I can understand you not winning,but i will not forgive you for not trying.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Tue Sep 28, 2010 11:52 pm
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Wed Sep 29, 2010 8:24 am
SubratGmat2011 wrote:The American Revolution arose partly in response to British general search warrants, which gave arbitrary and
intrusive powers to government officers. Thus, the founders created the Fourth Amendment to protect against
unreasonable and warrant-less intrusions of privacy by a powerful and partisan federal government. During the
20th century, countless dictators have used arbitrary and intrusive surveillance to monitor and suppress dissidents.
Any democracy that does not enforce equally extensive protections will systematically suppress dissent. Which of
the following, if true, best weakens the argument?
• The United Kingdom’s parliamentary system does not have such extensive protections but has never systematically
suppressed dissent.
• Many dictators have been very beneficial and constructive leaders for their countries.
• Many democracies have haphazardly used surveillance to monitor dissidents and suppress dissent during times of
war.
• Some dictators have been supported by the United States.
• At least some countries in the former Soviet Union now have democratic elections but still suppress dissent.
i will choose A for this CR.. its so difficulto understand it.
i chose A because the conclusion said ANY democracy country that doesnt enforce protection WILL supress dissent
and A states UK doesnt enforce protection and UK also suppressed dissent.
what is the answer?
Join the discussion

by g000fy » Wed Sep 29, 2010 9:20 am
A is the best pick. Reason same as given by diebeatsthegmat
Join the discussion

by hitmis » Wed Sep 29, 2010 7:12 pm
This one is tricky. imo A
Join the discussion