3.In 1973, a remote town first acquired television. Shortly before broadcasts began there, a study was made of children's behavior. A similar study in the same community, after two years of TV, showed that the aggression rate among children of this age had increased by 160%. The conclusion drawn was that TV plays an important role in generating aggressive behavior in children. A similar study, covering the same years, was made in two similar communities that had had television for decades. This study showed no change in the aggression rate from 1973 to 1975. The results of the second study:
A) suggest that the prevalence of violent themes in TV programming may be explained by the tendencies toward violence which are deeply-rooted in human nature.
B) indicate that different social groups may react quite differently to similar stimuli.
C) demonstrate that long-term exposure to TV has no more severe effects than short-term exposure.
D) support the conclusion drawn from the first study.
E) disprove the conclusion drawn from the first study.
My choice was c. OA -D. please clarify
CR
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 6:18 am
- Thanked: 16 times
- Followed by:6 members
This can only be done by POE.
C is wrong because we don't know about the severity of effects in both the cases. We just know the difference.
On one hand it brought a lot of difference, on the other hand there was no difference since they were already aggressive enough to produce much difference.
C is wrong because we don't know about the severity of effects in both the cases. We just know the difference.
On one hand it brought a lot of difference, on the other hand there was no difference since they were already aggressive enough to produce much difference.
If you've liked my post, let me know by pressing the thanks button.
- Jim@StratusPrep
- MBA Admissions Consultant
- Posts: 2279
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:51 am
- Location: New York
- Thanked: 660 times
- Followed by:266 members
- GMAT Score:770
The second study acts as a control group for the first. It shows that there were no outside factors that would influence aggressive behavior.
GMAT Answers provides a world class adaptive learning platform.
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review
- Ashujain
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 4:36 am
- Thanked: 29 times
- Followed by:1 members
Jim, can you please elaborate it?Jim@StratusPrep wrote:The second study acts as a control group for the first. It shows that there were no outside factors that would influence aggressive behavior.
Because when i first read the argument, it seems to be disapproving the first study's conclusion as it says that TV does not influence the aggressive behavior.
- Birottam Dutta
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 342
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:50 am
- Thanked: 214 times
- Followed by:19 members
- GMAT Score:740
Dear Ashu Jain,
The first study proves that introducing the tv is causing the aggression among the kids to increase. The second study, by virtue of showing that aggression in unchanged among the children (and keeping in mind that television has been part of that community for a long time), reaffirms that no factor other than the introduction of tv causes aggression to increase among kids.
So, the second study, confirms the concussion drawn by the first study.
C is the bait that is thrown out to the students but do not take it.
It is D!
The first study proves that introducing the tv is causing the aggression among the kids to increase. The second study, by virtue of showing that aggression in unchanged among the children (and keeping in mind that television has been part of that community for a long time), reaffirms that no factor other than the introduction of tv causes aggression to increase among kids.
So, the second study, confirms the concussion drawn by the first study.
C is the bait that is thrown out to the students but do not take it.
It is D!
Folks please check this out
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7p56NzAVKc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7p56NzAVKc
- Gaurav 2013-fall
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:45 pm
- Thanked: 12 times
- GMAT Score:700
Birottam,
How can no change means increase in aggression. I think none of the answer choice is correct.
How can no change means increase in aggression. I think none of the answer choice is correct.
Birottam Dutt wrote:Dear Ashu Jain,
The first study proves that introducing the tv is causing the aggression among the kids to increase. The second study, by virtue of showing that aggression in unchanged among the children (and keeping in mind that television has been part of that community for a long time), reaffirms that no factor other than the introduction of tv causes aggression to increase among kids.
So, the second study, confirms the concussion drawn by the first study.
C is the bait that is thrown out to the students but do not take it.
It is D!
Jim,Jim@StratusPrep wrote:The second study acts as a control group for the first. It shows that there were no outside factors that would influence aggressive behavior.
Could you please throw more light on this one. It is clear that "no outside factors would influence aggressive behavior" but based on second study how do we conclude that TV is the culprit. The study says "No change in rate of aggression"
Regards
Nitin
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 10:04 am
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:4 members
shrutib wrote:3.In 1973, a remote town first acquired television. Shortly before broadcasts began there, a study was made of children's behavior. A similar study in the same community, after two years of TV, showed that the aggression rate among children of this age had increased by 160%. The conclusion drawn was that TV plays an important role in generating aggressive behavior in children. A similar study, covering the same years, was made in two similar communities that had had television for decades. This study showed no change in the aggression rate from 1973 to 1975. The results of the second study:
A) suggest that the prevalence of violent themes in TV programming may be explained by the tendencies toward violence which are deeply-rooted in human nature.
B) indicate that different social groups may react quite differently to similar stimuli.
C) demonstrate that long-term exposure to TV has no more severe effects than short-term exposure.
D) support the conclusion drawn from the first study.
E) disprove the conclusion drawn from the first study.
My choice was c. OA -D. please clarify
Pls use Spoilers