IMO A

stop@800 wrote:IMO A

Any specific reason to choose (A)?

I am looking for reason too......
OA is A

claim: refrigerated food spoils bc (a) out of sight (b) back of shelf
alternative: rotate shelves? nope food still rots bc it falls off in the rear corners ie back of shelf and out of sight

The question you need to ask yourself is - How to identify the assumptions and underlying assumptions?

In this you want to focus your attn on the alternative which was rotating shelves and the fact that the argument tells you that it wont work bc stuff falls off of it and into the back. This means that there is something wrong with the actual design of the shelves within the confines of the fridge.

Start with choices that highlight designs of the shelves within the fridge - A and E, and eliminate the rest. B is out bc you dont care about the windows. C is out bc it doesnt narrow design to the shelves themselves and its basically saying that food doesn't respond to design changes - which doesnt make sense. D is out bc it doesnt talk about the shelves. So that leaves E and A. Start with E, what significance does it have to the statement that food still rots bc it falls off in the rear corners ie back of shelf and out of sight? Not sure, move to A. Since A talks about the design and gives you an underlying assumption of the circular design of a rotating shelf and food falling off of it bc of a square box design of the fridge, it is the better answer.

In my opinion A is the most logical one.