-
gmatmachoman
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
- Thanked: 173 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:710
This one is a LSAT based CR.
- Attachments
-
mmslf75 wrote:pandeyvineet24 wrote:IMO B
pandeyji,
why B ?
Pandeyji,pandeyvineet24 wrote:mmslf75 wrote:pandeyvineet24 wrote:IMO B
pandeyji,
why B ?
A,D,E are out of scope.
C is again out because the argument talks about the confirmed cases and not the appearance of the symptoms.
Compared to 2 years ago, when it was 25%, the percentage of raccoons suffering from disease went up to 50% , but the number of confirmed cases have come down from 32 to 18. Most probably this happened because the number of raccoons have come down, which is what the statement B says, a large number of raccoons died two years ago. Also of the few ones that survived, the higher percentage of raccoons are still sufferring from the disease.