BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

nice cr

Expert replies
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by akg_gmat » Tue Oct 07, 2008 5:20 am
IMO: C
Last edited by akg_gmat on Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by Jatinder » Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:12 am
IMO C
Negate this and the argument falls appart
Join the discussion

by PussInBoots » Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:40 am
Jatinder wrote:IMO C
Negate this and the argument falls appart
I like your explanation, short&simple.
Join the discussion

by raunekk » Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:23 am
imo:c

as said above: negation rule works best..
Join the discussion

by vivek.kapoor83 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:00 am
whts wrong with B ?
Join the discussion

by vivek.kapoor83 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:07 am
Negating B also works. i think
Join the discussion

by schumi_gmat » Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:41 am
Negating B. supports the conclusion.

Negation -
If Percentage who attend college is not higher now......then by increase in the number of people to attend will increase the average salary. Hence it supports the arg.

ANS C
Join the discussion

by vivek.kapoor83 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:41 pm
cn u also explain howcm c????????with the explantion ..how u negate that
Join the discussion

by raunekk » Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:49 pm
using d negation rule on C


c:the higher average salary for jobs requiring a college degree is due largely to a scarcity among the kravonias workforce of people with a college degree

thus it says that the higher average salary is due to the scarcity of college degree people and not because the number of college dergree people are more...

Thus if this happens..
i.e if the number of college degree people increases=>the average salary will decrease..
this goes against the conclusion...thus the argument falls apart.

thx
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:37 am
I chose D.

I negated D and thot it broke the argument.
Join the discussion

by Bidisha800 » Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:17 pm
Clearly (C)
Join the discussion

by kris77 » Thu May 12, 2016 12:54 pm
Answer C seems to be logical one out of other answer choices
Join the discussion