karthikpandian19 wrote:The money spent developing a particular software application does not accurately reflect the quality of the application. If it did, the software with the lowest development costs would also be the worst performing and least reliable. In fact, when figures are adjusted to include a number of different worldwide markets, technology experts have found that some of the companies that spent the most money developing their software actually produced much of the software that was considered lowest in quality.

Assuming the statements above are true, which of the following can be inferred from them?


(A) Companies that spend very little to develop products are often very successful.

(B) Development managers for the companies that spend the most on software development often lose sight of important details because of the high volume of work that they oversee.

(C) Increasing spending on the development of a software application will not necessarily result in an improvement in the quality of that application.

(D) Different worldwide markets are equally likely to rate the quality of a expensively developed software application as "low."

(E) The highest quality applications are rarely the most expensive to develop.