BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Knewton CR

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 139
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 11:06 pm
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:710

Knewton CR

by badpoem » Mon Aug 01, 2011 8:49 am
In order to compensate for rising costs within the state prison system, one state legislator recommends increasing the amount of money allotted to state prisons by ten percent per prisoner. The legislator claims that this will increase the overall budget for the prison system by ten percent in the coming years.

On which of the following assumptions does the legislator's argument depend?

(A) The rising costs within the state prison system are not the result of an increase in the number of prisoners in the system.

(B) The total number of prisoners in the state prison system will not decrease in upcoming years.

(C) The number of people who are sentenced to non-prison sentences, like community service, rather than prison sentences, will not increase.

(D) The total number of prisons in use in the state will not decrease from its current level.

(E) The average number of prisoners in each prison will not decrease in the coming years.


OA later.
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 2:00 pm

by farrous13 » Mon Aug 01, 2011 8:59 am
B
right?
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Mon Aug 01, 2011 9:27 am
Held between B and E. but i would choose B over E.
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 5:57 pm
Location: US
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:640

by 2011mbaspirant » Mon Aug 01, 2011 10:44 am
IMO E. Since it is related to the "increase the overall budget for the prison system by ten percent in the coming years." the legislator assumes that the average population will not decrease and remain constant. Whereas if the total prisoner population spikes to a higher level then the overall budget may exceed the ten percent mark.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1077
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:44 am
Thanked: 118 times
Followed by:33 members
GMAT Score:710

by bblast » Mon Aug 01, 2011 10:22 pm
Hi,

E should be incorrect over B since the average number of prisoners/prison does not tell us about the total figure. It may be a case in which all prisons in the state are closed except 1. In this case the budget will substantially increase or decrease based on the occupancy of 1 prison. Similarly if several new prisons open up we may have another unknown figure for cost/person increase or decrease.

So choose B over E which negates the possibility that the total number of prisoners will decrease and hence costs will shoot up by an exact 10%.
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:40 am
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:700

by sunnyjohn » Mon Aug 01, 2011 10:43 pm
[spoiler]IMO: B[/spoiler]

Argument: 10% budget increase for each prisoner will increase the overall budget by 10%.

The gap I see here is => Author is driving total budget of prison from each prisoner budget.


(A) The rising costs within the state prison system are not the result of an increase in the number of prisoners in the system.
--> This actually weakens the argument. Rising cost were at some part because of increased number of prisoners, Otherwise Author would not have been making an argument.

(B) The total number of prisoners in the state prison system will not decrease in upcoming years.


(C) The number of people who are sentenced to non-prison sentences, like community service, rather than prison sentences, will not increase.
> Irrelevant.

(D) The total number of prisons in use in the state will not decrease from its current level.
> Talk out of scope stuff.

(E) The average number of prisoners in each prison will not decrease in the coming years.
> Increase the scope to each prison, whereas argument talks about state prison system only.

Though I am not very convinced with option B, but by POE B looks an answer. Lets see how experts explain the argument.
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:19 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:7 members

by Ozlemg » Tue Aug 02, 2011 1:15 am
IMO B

for the prison system is the tricky word here. It does not include prisons as well; but only prisioners.

(E) The average number of prisoners in each prison will not decrease in the coming years.
Av number of prisoners = Total number of prisioners/prisions

nominator and denominator may totally incraese by 10% but average could be same as previous. he does not assume this. He only assumes total number of prisionrs will increase
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 10:04 am
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:4 members

by thestartupguy » Fri Oct 28, 2011 6:33 am
IMO B
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 7:06 pm

by vinayaerostar » Fri Oct 28, 2011 8:06 am
IMO D
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 418
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:48 pm
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:3 members

by gmatdriller » Sat Oct 29, 2011 12:03 am
Option C talks about non-prison sentences like community service.

But how do we know that these non-prison sentences are not part of the
prison system?

If these non-prison sentences are part of the prison system,
the author must have assumed that they will not further be a burden on the budget,
and that the only consideration is the expenses relating to the prison-related
sentences.
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 65
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 6:22 am
Thanked: 4 times

by krishnakumar.ks » Sat Oct 29, 2011 12:30 am
I will go with B. When they are talking about amount per person, the avg doesn't matter thus ruling out E.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 608
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:8 members

by saketk » Sat Oct 29, 2011 7:38 am
OA not posted till now. I will also choose option B over E
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 139
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 11:06 pm
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:710

by badpoem » Sat Oct 29, 2011 8:18 am
The OA is B
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 418
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:48 pm
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:3 members

by gmatdriller » Tue Nov 01, 2011 3:12 pm
Posting only OAs and IMOs are not ALL that is needed in an
interactive learning forum.

Please I'd be glad for a response to the point I raised in my last post.

Regards.
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 4:20 am

by [email protected] » Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:19 am
gmatdriller, I was firstly thinking the same way as you, but now I suppose that by saying "NON-prison sentences" the author assumes that they are NOT a part of a prison system.
Top
Post new topic Post Reply